Communicating cardiovascular health information and improving coordination with primary care: A Childhood Cancer Survivor Study randomized trial.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
10011 Background: Childhood cancer survivors are at risk of early cardiovascular disease (CVD). We conducted a survivorship care plan (SCP)-based counseling intervention to improve CVD risk factor control in adult-aged survivors. Methods: Randomized (1:1) trial of survivors at high CVD risk based on history of anthracycline or chest radiotherapy exposures with undertreated hypertension (≥130/80 mmHg), dyslipidemia (LDL ≥160 mg/dL or triglyceride ≥200 mg/dL), and/or glucose intolerance (threshold varied if history of pre-diabetes or diabetes) based on in-home testing. Approximating a survivorship clinic visit, the intervention consisted of a remotely delivered session with an advanced practice provider to review results, a SCP with personalized CVD risk information, and an action plan to help manage CVD risk factors. A remote booster session was provided 4 months later with the action plan updated. Control participants only received a copy of their in-home results with abnormalities noted and written encouragement to follow-up with their primary care provider (PCP). Blood pressure, lipid profile, and glucose tolerance were retested after 1y. For both groups, all participant materials were sent to PCPs throughout the study, and PCP medical records were abstracted at study completion. Logistic regression assessed the odds ratio (OR) for undertreatment at 1y associated with the intervention, adjusting for pre-specified variables (sex, current age, time since cancer, insurance status, recent history of survivorship clinic visit, and undertreated CVD risk factor). Results: Among 644 survivors who completed in-home testing, 347 met inclusion criteria and were randomized (175 intervention; overall 52% male, mean age 40y, 31y since cancer diagnosis); 264 with 1y follow-up (126 intervention). At baseline, rates of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and glucose intolerance were 53%, 52%, and 49%, respectively; 43% had > 1 undertreated condition. Although the intervention achieved > 95% satisfaction, it was not associated with reduced undertreatment vs control (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.7-1.3). Notably, 48% of intervention and 44% of control participants had less undertreatment after 1y. In secondary analysis, greater internal locus of control was associated with less undertreatment at 1y (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.9). The intervention group was more likely than controls to have CVD risk (+10 vs -1%), SCP (+17 vs -2%), and some late effects surveillance plan (+8 vs +2%) documented within PCP records at 1y vs baseline (p < 0.05 for all). Conclusions: While a remotely delivered counseling intervention did not reduce CVD risk factor undertreatment compared with provision of test results alone, both study arms had > 40% reduction in undertreatment. These results suggest that simply providing a formal CVD risk assessment to high-risk cancer survivors and their PCPs may be effective. Clinical trial information: NCT03104543 .
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».