Cognitive Impairments in Drug-Naive Patients With First-Episode Negative Symptom–Dominant Psychosis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Importance: Available antipsychotic medications are predominantly used to treat positive symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions, in patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP). However, treating negative and cognitive symptoms, which are closely related to functional outcomes, remains a challenge. Objective: To explore the cognitive characteristics of patients with negative symptom-dominant (NSD) psychosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This large-scale cross-sectional study of patients with FEP was led by the Shanghai Mental Health Center in China from 2016 to 2021, with participants recruited from 10 psychiatric tertiary hospitals. A comprehensive cognitive assessment was performed among 788 patients with FEP who were drug-naive. Symptom profiles were determined using the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS), and NSD was defined as a PANSS score for negative symptoms higher than that for positive and general symptoms. Positive symptom-dominant (PSD) and general symptom-dominant (GSD) psychosis were defined similarly. Data were analyzed in 2023. Exposure: Psychotic symptoms were categorized into 3 groups: NSD, PSD, and GSD. Main Outcomes and Measures: Neurocognitive performance, assessed using the Chinese version of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Consensus Cognitive Battery. Results: This study included 788 individuals with FEP (median age, 22 [IQR, 17-28] years; 399 men [50.6%]). Patients with NSD exhibited more-pronounced cognitive impairment than did those with PSD or GSD. Specifically, cognitive differences between the NSD and PSD group, as well as between the NSD and GSD group, were most notable in the processing speed and attention domains (Trail Making [F = 4.410; P = .01], Symbol Coding [F = 4.957; P = .007], Verbal Learning [F = 3.198; P = .04], and Continuous Performance [F = 3.057; P = .05]). Patients with PSD and GSD showed no significant cognitive differences. Cognitive impairment was positively associated with the severity of negative symptoms. Most of the cognitive function tests used were able to differentiate patients with NSD from those with PSD and GSD, with significant differences observed across a range of tests, from Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (χ2 = 3.968; P = .05) to Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia symbol coding (χ2 = 9.765; P = .002). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cross-sectional study of patients with FEP suggest the presence of a clinical subtype characterized by a predominance of negative symptoms and cognitive impairment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».