MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4399398189 · doi:10.1353/tj.2024.a929518

Mahabharata by Ravi Jain and Miriam Fernandes (review)

2024· article· en· W4399398189 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueTheatre Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueSouth Asian Cinema and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Mahabharata by Ravi Jain and Miriam Fernandes Stephen Low MAHABHARATA. Written and adapted by Ravi Jain and Miriam Fernandes. Directed by Ravi Jain. Shaw Festival Theatre, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario. March 26, 2023. The Mahabharata is an ancient Sanskrit epic poem that is rarely performed on contemporary stages. Toronto's Why Not Theatre, in association with the Barbican in London and the Shaw Festival in Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario, have brought this Indian epic to life for contemporary audiences. Director Ravi Jain and associate director Miriam Fernandes adapted the Mahabharata—using poetry from Carole Satyamurti's Mahabharata: A Modern Retelling (2015)—into a two-part, six-hour theatrical experience. Transforming the Mahabharata—which includes many sacred texts in the Hindu religious tradition, such as the Bhagavad Gita and an abbreviated version of the Ramayana—is a fraught task that involves making difficul choices, especially when it comes to cutting, abridging, and altering language, stories, and ideas that have deep spiritual meaning for many people around the world. As the playwrights' note for this production contends, there are "as many Mahabharatas as there are storytellers." This multiplicity is reflected in Jain and Fernandes' adaption and in a production that was ancient and contemporary, secular and spiritual, earthly and divine. The first part of this two-part epic, Karma: The Life We Inherit, began with Fernandes, as the Storyteller, stepping into a circle of red sand sprinkled on the stage, with the other members of the cast sitting on stools outside of it. By simply stepping over the perimeter of red sand into the circle, she established the formal performance space. She then lit a flame in a wide-mouthed metal bowl that she placed outside the circle. Fernandes, as the Storyteller, explained to King Janamejaya why he should show mercy to the snakes of the world; he was about to sacrifice several to a holy flame to avenge his father's death by venomous snakebite. This scenario acted as the framing narrative within which the Storyteller narrated the other tales that make up the Mahabharata. The flame Fernandes lit provided a sense of religious ritual to the proceedings but also stood in for the flame over which the snakes were held aloft as the King considered their fate. This initial framing was represented by a curtain of ropes, echoing the shape of snakes, hanging along the back of the stage. At first, this curtain of ropes appeared to be the sort of backstage mechanism present in any theatre—perhaps cords used to hoist scenery into the fly space above—which had been left exposed. But at a critical moment, they were raised up to represent the snakes that the King and his priests held over the flame before the entreaties of the Storyteller succeeded in making them pause their vengeful ritual. The Storyteller related the tales of the Mahabharata to the King to demonstrate that revenge begets revenge, establishing an endless cycle of violence. To persuade the King to break this cycle with an act of forgiveness and love, the Storyteller recounted the events that led to the inevitable war between the Pandavas, King Janamejaya's ancestors, and their cousin Duryodhana and his hundred brothers, the Kauravas. In this first part, the Storyteller provided explanations for certain mystical curses or blessings that some of the characters had upon them, which determined the action of the looming conflict—which was in turn central to the second part of the performance. Click for larger view View full resolution Ellora Patnaik (Kunti) in Mahabharata. (Photo: David Cooper.) Part 2, Dharma: The Life We Choose, focused on the story of the Kurukshetra War between the Kauravas and the Pandavas. In contrast to part 1, which did not include much of a set except the red sand and stools, the royal setting of much of the action of the second part was intimated by chandeliers hanging from the ceiling and oriental rugs laying across the stage, between which sat more red sand. After the war unleashed devastating violence and much death, part 2 concluded with the decision of King Janamejaya to grant clemency to the snakes. These stories and stories within stories...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,711
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,994

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,221
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle