Semi‐supervised learning framework with shape encoding for neonatal ventricular segmentation from 3D ultrasound
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) imaging has shown promise in non-invasive monitoring of changes in the lateral brain ventricles of neonates suffering from intraventricular hemorrhaging. Due to the poorly defined anatomical boundaries and low signal-to-noise ratio, fully supervised methods for segmentation of the lateral ventricles in 3D US images require a large dataset of annotated images by trained physicians, which is tedious, time-consuming, and expensive. Training fully supervised segmentation methods on a small dataset may lead to overfitting and hence reduce its generalizability. Semi-supervised learning (SSL) methods for 3D US segmentation may be able to address these challenges but most existing SSL methods have been developed for magnetic resonance or computed tomography (CT) images. PURPOSE: To develop a fast, lightweight, and accurate SSL method, specifically for 3D US images, that will use unlabeled data towards improving segmentation performance. METHODS: We propose an SSL framework that leverages the shape-encoding ability of an autoencoder network to enforce complex shape and size constraints on a 3D U-Net segmentation model. The autoencoder created pseudo-labels, based on the 3D U-Net predicted segmentations, that enforces shape constraints. An adversarial discriminator network then determined whether images came from the labeled or unlabeled data distributions. We used 887 3D US images, of which 87 had manually annotated labels and 800 images were unlabeled. Training/validation/testing sets of 25/12/50, 25/12/25 and 50/12/25 images were used for model experimentation. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean absolute surface distance (MAD), and absolute volumetric difference (VD) were used as metrics for comparing to other benchmarks. The baseline benchmark was the fully supervised vanilla 3D U-Net while dual task consistency, shape-aware semi-supervised network, correlation-aware mutual learning, and 3D U-Net Ensemble models were used as state-of-the-art benchmarks with DSC, MAD, and VD as comparison metrics. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test statistical significance between algorithms for DSC and VD with the threshold being p < 0.05 and corrected to p < 0.01 using the Bonferroni correction. The random-access memory (RAM) trace and number of trainable parameters were used to compare the computing efficiency between models. RESULTS: Relative to the baseline 3D U-Net model, our shape-encoding SSL method reported a mean DSC improvement of 6.5%, 7.7%, and 4.1% with a 95% confidence interval of 4.2%, 5.7%, and 2.1% using image data splits of 25/12/50, 25/12/25, and 50/12/25, respectively. Our method only used a 1GB increase in RAM compared to the baseline 3D U-Net and required less than half the RAM and trainable parameters compared to the 3D U-Net ensemble method. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our extensive literature survey, this is one of the first reported works to propose an SSL method designed for segmenting organs in 3D US images and specifically one that incorporates unlabeled data for segmenting neonatal cerebral lateral ventricles. When compared to the state-of-the-art SSL and fully supervised learning methods, our method yielded the highest DSC and lowest VD while being computationally efficient.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».