Glofitamab monotherapy retreatment in patients with heavily pre-treated relapsed or refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL): Results from a phase I/II study.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
7020 Background: Fixed-duration glofitamab, a CD20xCD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody with a novel 2:1 configuration, has demonstrated efficacy and manageable safety in a Phase I/II study (NCT03075696) in heavily pre-treated patients (pts) with R/R NHL (Dickinson. N Engl J Med 2022). We report efficacy and safety data for pts with R/R NHL retreated with glofitamab monotherapy after response to initial glofitamab treatment. Methods: Pts who completed initial treatment and achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease were eligible for retreatment after documented progression. Initial treatment included obinutuzumab pre-treatment (Gpt) 7 days before the first glofitamab dose, then glofitamab intravenously at either a fixed dose of 0.015–25mg (14- or 21-day cycles) or step-up dosing (2.5mg, then 10mg in Cycle [C] 1, followed by a target dose of 16 or 30mg [C2 onward, 21- day cycles]) for up to 12 cycles. Retreatment was administered at the escalation dose received or at the highest glofitamab dose cleared in the study at time of retreatment, with Gpt 7 days before the first glofitamab dose. As with initial treatment, retreatment was permitted for 12 cycles or until progression or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurred first. Results: As of Sept 4, 2023, 13 pts (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], n=4; follicular lymphoma [FL], n=4; mantle cell lymphoma [MCL], n=2; transformed FL [trFL], n=2; high grade B-cell lymphoma, n=1) had received glofitamab retreatment (retreatment dose: 10mg, n=1; 10/16mg, n=1; 2.5/10/30mg, n=11). Median age was 63.0 years (range: 44–81). With initial treatment, 9 pts had CR and 4 pts had PR (best response by investigator). Median time from end of initial treatment to initiation of retreatment was 13.0 months (range: 4.1–27.4). Median number of retreatment cycles received was 5 (range: 2–12). During retreatment, 9 pts (69.2%) responded: CR, 38.5% (FL, n=2; trFL, n=1; MCL, n=2); PR, 30.8% (FL, n=1; trFL, n=1; DLBCL, n=2). Of the 5 pts with CR at retreatment, 3 pts had CR and 2 pts had PR with initial treatment. Of the 4 pts with PR at retreatment, 3 pts had CR and 1 pt had PR with initial treatment. Median retreatment follow-up time was 25.9 months and 5 pts had responses ongoing at data cut-off (FL, n=2; MCL, n=2; trFL, n=1). The safety profile for glofitamab retreatment was consistent with prior reports of glofitamab monotherapy in R/R NHL (Hutchings. J Clin Oncol 2021). Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 7 pts (53.8%; all Grade 1/2). Exploratory data on B-cell pharmacodynamics, CD20 expression, and T-cell status before retreatment will be presented. Conclusions: Glofitamab monotherapy retreatment was efficacious in heavily pre-treated pts with R/R NHL who responded to initial glofitamab treatment before subsequent progression. The safety profile was consistent with that of initial treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT03075696 .
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».