The Effectiveness of Medical Adherence Mobile Health Solutions for Individuals With Epilepsy: Protocol for a Systematic Review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Epilepsy requires continuous management and treatment to optimize patient outcomes. The advancement of digital health has led to the development of various mobile health (mHealth) tools designed to enhance treatment adherence among individuals with epilepsy. These solutions offer crucial support through features such as reminders, educational resources, personalized feedback, assistance with managing costs, shared decision-making, and access to supportive communities. To design effective medication adherence mHealth solutions, it is essential to evaluate the effectiveness of existing mHealth tools, understand the unique circumstances of different patients, and identify the roles of health care professionals within the digital care pathway. Existing studies on epilepsy primarily focus on self-management, whereas the effectiveness and usability of medical adherence mHealth solutions often remain overlooked. Furthermore, the involvement of health care professionals in digital care pathways for epilepsy as well as the impact of adherence mHealth solutions on the patient experience have not been adequately explored. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of current mHealth solutions designed to improve medical adherence among patients with epilepsy. Furthermore, the study will examine the experiences of patients using mHealth solutions for maintaining medical adherence in epilepsy care. Finally, this review intends to determine the roles of health care professionals within mHealth systems aimed at supporting adherence to medication among patients with epilepsy. METHODS: A systematic literature review has been selected as the appropriate method to address the research questions, adhering to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The inclusion and exclusion criteria have been carefully selected, and both qualitative and quantitative analyses will be used to analyze the results. The expected results will mainly focus on the comparison, classification, and analysis of the effectiveness of current medical adherence mHealth tools. Moreover, the patient experiences using available medical adherence mHealth tools for epilepsy will be assessed. Finally, the role of health care professionals in the epilepsy digital care pathway will be explored, with emphasis on medical adherence. RESULTS: The initial search, full-text screening, and data extraction have been carried out. Thirty-three papers were included in the final stage of the review. The study is expected to be completed by October 2024. CONCLUSIONS: To enhance the digital care pathway for epilepsy, a medical adherence mHealth solution should be personalized, manage medications, include an alarm system, track seizures, support consultations, and offer updated treatment plans. This study aims to understand how findings from the research questions can improve mHealth solutions for individuals with epilepsy. Insights from this research on the effectiveness of current mHealth adherence solutions will provide guidance for developing future mHealth systems, making them more efficient and effective in managing epilepsy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD4202347400; https://tinyurl.com/48mfx22e. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/55123.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,066 | 0,080 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,021 | 0,023 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,014 | 0,013 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,059 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».