Does the relationship between time-varying achieved HbA1c and risk of coronary events depend on haptoglobin phenotype within the Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) study?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Our previous research has identified the haptoglobin (Hp) phenotype as a potential biomarker that could be used to personalize glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) to prevent coronary artery disease (CAD), the most common cardiovascular disease (CVD). We observed that attaining HbA1c ≥8.0% compared with 7.0–7.9% was consistently associated with incident CAD risk among participants in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) study with the Hp2-2 type(1). No similar association was observed among participants without the Hp2-2 type. However, most ACCORD participants were middle-aged and older males who were at high risk of CVD. Therefore, the optimal glycemic target for CAD prevention for the Hp types remains unclear among women, younger adults, and those at lower risk of CVD. Objective To explore the relationship between achieving specific clinically relevant HbA1c targets and risk of incident CAD in separate Hp types in a diverse cohort of individuals living with T2DM (the Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) study(2)). Methods Hp type was measured in 4,539 blood samples from the Look AHEAD study using a validated assay. Cox regression models with time-varying covariables were used to quantify the association between time-varying achieved HbA1c (<6.5%, 6.5-6.9% and ≥8.0% compared to 7.0-7.9%), updated at years 1-4 and biennially thereafter, and incident CAD in the Hp2-2 (n=1,590) and non-Hp2-2 (n=2,949) types separately. Further pre-specified subgroup analyses by age, sex, and history of CVD were performed in each Hp type group separately. Results During 16 years of follow-up, 744 incident CAD cases were documented. Compared with HbA1c 7.0-7.9%, having HbA1c <6.5% was associated with a 29% lower CAD risk among participants with the non-Hp2-2 type (adjusted HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.90). In subgroup analyses, this association was present in participants with the non-Hp2-2 type who were male (0.58, 0.42-0.80), who did not have a history of CVD (0.67, 0.49-0.93), and who were aged ≥65 years at baseline (0.64, 0.43-0.95). HbA1c ≥8.0% was associated with CAD risk among participants with the Hp2-2 type who had a history of CVD (1.81, 1.02-3.21). No associations were observed between the other HbA1c targets and CAD risk when Hp2-2 participants were combined or partitioned into subgroups. Conclusion Achieving HbA1c <6.5% compared with 7.0–7.9% reduced the risk of CAD events in Look AHEAD participants with the non-Hp2-2 type, but not in participants with the Hp2-2 type. HbA1c ≥8.0% was associated with higher CAD risk among participants who had the Hp2-2 type and a history of CVD.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».