Physiological determinants underlying a meaningful improvement in VO2peak following exercise training in anthracycline-treated breast cancer survivors
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Exercise training (ExT) is emerging as a useful therapy to address limitations in VO2peak in anthracycline-treated breast cancer (BC) survivors. However, the factors necessary for improving VO2peak during (neo)adjuvant BC therapy remain unclear. Purpose To explore the physiologic factors that were associated with a meaningful increase in VO2peak following a 12-month structured ExT intervention in breast cancer survivors undergoing anthracycline-based therapy. Methods This was a secondary analysis of the BReast cancer EXercise InTervention (BREXIT) Trial using baseline and 12-month data from participants randomized to ExT with complete VO2peak data at baseline and 12-months (n=48). A meaningful increase in VO2peak was defined as a ≥1.65 mL/kg/min improvement in VO2peak from baseline (pre-chemotherapy) to 12-months (n=22, 46% of ExT group) as this corresponds to the minimal detectable change from our laboratory and exceeds previously published values for a minimally clinically important difference. VO2peak, peak heart rate (HRpeak) and peak arterial O2 saturation were assessed from a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test. Peak exercise cardiac function (stroke volume [SVpeak] and cardiac output [Qcpeak]) was assessed by exercise cardiac magnetic resonance. Peak exercise convective O2 delivery (QO2peak), arterio-venous oxygen difference (a-vO2diff) and skeletal muscle diffusive O2 conductance (O2 transport from microvasculature to mitochondria [DMO2]) were calculated from VO2peak, arterial O2 saturation, exercise hemodynamic measures and haemoglobin concentration (assessed via venous blood draw) according to previously published equations. Results There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, baseline VO2peak or cardiac function between those who increased VO2peak or not. Those with increased VO2peak had higher ExT adherence (78% vs 68%, P=0.005). As expected, the increased VO2peak group had a 21% improvement in VO2peak from baseline to 12-months compared to the no change in the no VO2peak increase group (-2%; interaction P<0.001). Both groups showed comparable increases in SVpeak (+12% vs +7%, interaction P=0.09), Qcpeak (+13% vs +11%, Interaction P=0.48) and QO2peak (+14% vs +7%, interaction P=0.13). The key factors differentiating the two groups was that the increased VO2peak group also increased DMO2 (+17%, interaction P<0.001), that acted to maintain the a-vO2diff. In contrast, the group with stable VO2peak experienced no change in DMO2, which resulted in a decrease in the a-vO2diff (-12%, interaction P<0.001) and explains why they saw negligible change in VO2peak. Conclusion In anthracycline-treated BC survivors, achieving a meaningful improvement in VO2peak with exercise training requires concurrent adaptations in factors governing O2 delivery (peak cardiac function) and diffusion of O2 into skeletal muscle, highlighting the importance of multi-modal exercise training interventions in this population.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».