Directional succession and species-specific patterns observed in repeat study of vascular plants at three glacier foreland chronosequences in the Canadian High Arctic
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The expanding area of glacier forelands provides new terrain for ecosystem development. Plant succession facilitates this development, but this process remains poorly documented in marginal environments such as the High Arctic. This paper presents the results of the first repeat study of glacier foreland chronosequences conducted in the Canadian High Arctic. The forelands of Twin Glacier, Beitstad Glacier, and Teardrop Glacier near Alexandra Fiord, Ellesmere Island, Nunavut were first surveyed in 1995, and these surveys were repeated 21 years later using the same methods. The objectives of this study were to document the patterns of vascular plant species composition and abundance across these three forelands to (1) determine the accuracy of the hypothesis from the original study that succession on these forelands was directional, and (2) investigate the use of the chronosequence method in High Arctic succession studies. Forelands were surveyed using % cover estimates or presence/absence counts. Indicator species analysis and rates of change were used to quantify shifts in vascular plant species over time. Total plant cover increased by 2.4% in the first 100 m of the Twin Glacier foreland study area, and species richness also increased on younger terrain. Rates of peak cover and first appearance advance varied greatly between species and forelands, but were generally faster for graminoid and forb species than shrub species, and slower on species-poor Beitstad Glacier foreland. At all three forelands there was a general pattern of directional succession as all species advanced towards the retreating glacier margin. This supports the original hypothesis that directional succession is a common pattern for glacier forelands in the High Arctic. However, we also found that species-specific patterns and rates of change acted to create assemblages that differed between 1995 and 2016. Different abundances of species and successional trajectories were observed between the three forelands, pointing to the importance of local species pools and dispersal limitation. Finally, we observed that the first occurrence of most species was further from the glacier margin in 2016 compared to 1995, perhaps due to accelerating rates of glacier retreat. These species-specific patterns, differences between forelands, and the delayed response of vegetation to glacier retreat demonstrate the importance of using repeat studies over time and replication over space to confirm the results observed in High Arctic glacier foreland chronosequence studies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».