MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4400031844 · doi:10.31274/cc-20240624-1117

Phenotyping protocol for soybeans of maturity groups 000 and 00: screening for tolerance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum

2021· report· en· W4400031844 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cassandra Lavoie

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typereport
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiquePlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSclerotinia sclerotiorumMaturity (psychological)Protocol (science)BiologyHorticultureMedicinePsychologyDevelopmental psychologyPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

As soybeans are grown in higher latitudes in the northern regions, double (00) and triple zero (000) maturity group (MG) varieties will be bred. White mold (WM) is a concern in Northern growing environments, and appropriate screening protocols for reliable and reproducible phenotyping will be required. The available data on pathogen resistance screening is currently minimal for MG 0 to 000. Investigation of field and greenhouse inoculation methods were conducted to make preliminary observations and assess their suitability to early maturity soybeans. The first objective of this research was to determine if soybean inoculation with Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary (Ss), the fungus that causes WM and Sclerotinia stem rot (SSR) in soybeans, with spray inoculum can cause infection that can be differentiated for disease ratings. The second objective was to establish a protocol for applying spray inoculum in a greenhouse, which can be used to phenotype plants and build datasets for the future genotyping of resistant breeding lines for soybean cultivar development.\nDuring 2017 and 2018, research was conducted in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, on fields with a history of SSR occurrence in canola (Brassica napus L.). Greenhouse protocols were conducted in the L. F. Kristjanson Biotechnology Complex in Saskatoon. Soybean varieties of early maturing groups 00 and 000 with known reactions to WM were sprayed with Ss inoculum of ascospores and/or mycelium fragments to screen for WM tolerance. In both environments, inoculum treatments differed in their composition and application frequencies. Data was intended to be collected for percentage stand, canopy width, disease presence, and disease severity. The high ambient temperatures and low precipitation resulted in unfavorable conditions for disease establishment. The greenhouse conditions were better suited for disease expression; however, unknown contamination of the control precluded data collection. An important observation of this preliminary research indicated spray inoculum is unreliable for field and greenhouse use.\nAfter a series of unsuccessful spray inoculation trials, the cut stem and mycelium plug method was executed in the L. F. Kristjanson Biotechnology Complex in Saskatoon in 2019. The study was a continuation of the preliminary research, which intended to identify a reliable and reproducible screening protocol for phenotyping genetic resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary (Ss) in soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr.). Soybeans from the 00 and 000 maturity group (MG) were inoculated with mycelium plugs made of agar from two different Ss isolates in a greenhouse environment over two experimental periods. Plants were inoculated and then moved to the humidity chamber for the 48-hour incubation period. Once incubation was complete, plants were removed from the humidity chamber, and qualitative scores on overall plant health were taken at seven, ten, and fourteen days post-inoculation. On the 14th-day post-inoculation, measurements of the lesion length and width were also recorded.\nANOVA with a Tukey Test and correlations were used to determine the significance of experimental factors. Isolate was found to have a significant effect on lesion length in one of two experiments, while lesion width was not significantly affected by isolate in either experiment, with the ARC isolate having a greater ability to produce differentiated results for phenotyping. Plant health scores taken at fourteen days post-inoculation were found to be significant. Correlation coefficients were calculated between the two experiments to indicate repeatability. These values increased over the three days of data collected (7, 10, and 14 days post-inoculation). When comparing the two experiment replications, lesion length had a notably higher correlation compared to lesion width. Lesion width was found to have no significance.\nThe greenhouse screening with agar plugs was successful in its ability to generate a dataset that differentiated between genotypes. One of the two Ss isolate produced larger lesions in plants, but either could be used for screening in future studies as plant health was not significantly different between the two. The data also found that collecting data on the overall health of plants is a better indication of plant tolerance to the pathogen than measurements of lesion size. Health scores can be taken at multiple dates to track the progress of the disease, but scores 14 days post-inoculation was the most differentiated.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Protocole · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,029

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,082
Tête enseignante GPT0,297
Écart entre enseignants0,215 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreProtocole

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetPlant pathogens and resistance mechanismsTravaux en français237 207