MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4400103461 · doi:10.4103/ijph.ijph_1755_22

Lesson Learned from the Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Influenza Morbidity and Mortality during the Pre-COVID-19 Era could Be Reduced

2023· letter· en· W4400103461 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Aimé Kazadi Lukusa

Notice bibliographique

RevueIndian Journal of Public Health · 2023
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Établissements canadiensCentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des Laurentides
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPandemicMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)EpidemiologyHuman mortality from H5N1Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Environmental healthTransmission (telecommunications)Influenza A virusDemographyVirologyVirusDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)Internal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dear Editor, We have read with interest the paper by Sabeena et al.[1] which concluded in a systematic review and meta-analysis that globally there was a decline in influenza surveillance during the COVID-19 pandemic except in Canada. As a tremendous decline in influenza cases was observed even though influenza surveillance was maintained overall in Canada, we made the following hypothesis: we were not doing enough against influenza in the pre-COVID-19 era. Indeed, from March 28 to mid-September 2020, influenza surveillance in Quebec suffered from a significant decrease in the number of tests carried out by Sentinel Laboratories due to the massive efforts deployed to fight COVID-19. Fortunately, these changed quickly the following year. Despite the increasing number of samples tested in 2021–2022 for seasonal influenza from week 44 to week 13 in Sentinel laboratories, <1% were positives, whereas we reached 36% in the pre-COVID-19 years 2019–2020. A similar trend was found from the Canadian national surveillance data: FLuWatch surveillance (Flu [influenza]: FluWatch surveillance-Canada.ca). The epidemiological situation in Quebec, Canada, the United States, and Europe showed that influenza was almost absent in all areas in 2020–2021. These were attributed to both artifactual changes related to declines in routine health-seeking for respiratory illness as well as real changes in influenza virus circulation due to the widespread implementation of measures to mitigate the transmission of SARS-CoV-2.[2] The sustained use of infection prevention and control (IPAC) measures at all levels may explain the virtual disappearance of influenza during the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, maintaining preventive measures over time, and doing so consistently, is not feasible in the long-term perspectives. Thus, it is uncertain, unlikely, and unacceptable to apply these preventive measures with the same intensity after the pandemic. Besides flu vaccine and antiviral drugs, there is surely a threshold for raising and applying preventive actions that would significantly reduce the morbidity and mortality of both influenza and COVID-19 without necessarily harming the physical and mental health of anyone affected as it had been with more restrictive measures during the pandemic era.[3,4]Figure 1 shows the reduction in influenza mortality-morbidity as more restrictives measures are applied, but with a raised in mortality-morbidity due social isolation. Theoretically, from A to B (Arrow in the figure), mortality and morbidity could be reduced by rigorous and consistent application of preventive measures without increasing adverse effects due to a lack of social interactions.Figure 1: Preventive measures, influenza morbidity-mortality, and health harm trend.While writing this paper, we have to consider the following. First, new variants spread more quickly. Second, vaccines and infection are transforming SARS-COV-2 into a manageable “endemic” respiratory virus. Thus, it is about preventing severe disease, protecting vulnerable people, and protecting the health system. Thereby, we hope that the acquired living way, processes, and protocols put in place when fighting COVID-19 will have a downward impact on the burden of influenza on the health-care system. Rational plans are needed to lower both influenza and COVID-19 burdens using IPAC measures without necessarily confining and restricting people’s mobility. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,015
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,292
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0150,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,464
Tête enseignante GPT0,490
Écart entre enseignants0,027 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueIndian Journal of Public HealthMême sujetInfluenza Virus Research StudiesTravaux en français237 207