Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Kevin McCranie, currently a professor of Comparative Strategy at the US Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island, has written a fine account of the two predominant naval strategists that, in effect, created the field that before them was largely unwritten, if not unconsidered.The two individuals, one American and one British, are Alfred Mahan and Julian Corbett.Both articulated an approach to naval strategy that had much in common, yet involved important differences that reflected the motivations of the two thinkers in undertaking the work that they did, as well as the differences in the place of the navies in each country at the time.The importance of the pair is that no one has risen to take their place in the forefront of maritime strategic affairs, signifying the originality of their work and its seminal nature.McCrainie has provided real service in bringing the two thinkers together in a convenient package and has well assessed their work, noting their similarities and differences, as well as their ongoing importance.Mahan started with the publication of his well known work The Influence of Sea Power upon History 1660-1783, first published in 1890 and never out of print since.At the date of publication, Mahan's naval career was winding down and, it must be said, he was not overly successful in the business of going to sea and exercising command.He was, however, a fine lecturer at the newly opened US Naval War College, a post he earned as a result of this book.From there he set about writing prolifically on naval affairs, some historical, such as his first, and others more polemical in seeking to push US naval policy in a more aggressive direction.Indeed, at the time of writing the US Navy was relatively small and not much regarded in terms of national or international affairs.This Mahan sought to change and push the US in developing naval power reflective of its economic might and increasingly global interests.Mahan was a naval propagandist, with an agenda.Corbett had an entirely different background.He was well educated, with private fortune, and thereby able to indulge his interests in history without the support of an academic institution or formal position in any entity that might underwrite his work.He started life as a barrister, but was not an enthusiastic practitioner in that field.He joined the Naval Records Society in the early 1890s, that led to his preparing a volume on the Spanish War of 1585-87.He then wrote a book on the Tudor navy based on archival research that matched anything done in academia at the time.This book, Drake and the Tudor Navy, was published in 1898, with a follow-on effort, The Successors of Drake, in
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».