A NEW TEMPORARY TRAINING PROSTHESIS FOR PEOPLE WITH TRANSTIBIAL AMPUTATION: A TECHNICAL NOTE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: While waiting to receive a prosthesis, individuals with amputations could benefit from using a temporary training prosthesis to expedite the rehabilitation process and prepare them for subsequent walking with their prosthesis. OBJECTIVES: To design and build a temporary training prosthesis for people with a transtibial amputation. METHODOLOGY: Various temporary training prostheses were designed and simulated using SolidWorks software, followed by fabricating and testing multiple prototypes. Initial tests were conducted on five able bodied subjects without amputation to evaluate comfort, ensure the prototype functioned as intended, and to refine the design. The final prototype design had no weight-bearing on the residual limb end and required the person to wear a shrinker or silicone liner. FINDINGS: SolidWorks simulations showed that the device could tolerate up to 200 kg load. Subjective feedback indicated that body weight is primarily supported by the thigh section, while partially utilizing the patellar tendon and tibial flares. The thigh section can be shifted 5 cm up or down and 2.5 cm to the front or back from the knee joint center (to enhance knee stability or function). Additionally, the thigh angle can be adjusted to 0, 5, 10, or 15 degrees to accommodate hip flexion contracture. The shank section width is adjustable and can be shifted up or down based on the residual limb shape. All five able-bodied participants successfully walked with the non-amputee version of the temporary prosthesis prototype and the device withstood walking, sitting, and standing loads. CONCLUSION: An adjustable temporary training prosthesis was successfully designed, and pilot tested by five able-bodied individuals. Future testing will involve five experienced prosthetic users before conducting trials with individuals with a new transtibial amputation. Layman's Abstract A novel temporary training prosthesis was developed for individuals with new transtibial amputations while they await the healing of their residual limb and the receipt of a prosthesis. Utilizing SolidWorks computer-aided design software, various designs were explored, and rigorous testing was conducted to ensure durability and functionality. Adjustable features were incorporated to accommodate different body shapes and sizes. Initial testing on five people without amputations confirmed device effectiveness in supporting walking, sitting, and standing. Next, performance will be assessed on five experienced prosthetic users before proceeding to trials with individuals with a new transtibial amputation. This temporary prosthesis aims to expedite rehabilitation, enabling people to regain mobility and independence more efficiently. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/43034/32865 How To Cite: Gholizadeh H, Baddour N, Dudek N, Lemaire E.D. A new temporary training prosthesis for people with transtibial amputation: A technical note. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2024; Volume 7, Issue 1, No.2. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v7i1.43034 Corresponding Author: Hossein Gholizadeh, PhD, CP (Canada)Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.E-Mails: hgholizadeh@uottawa.ca, gholizadeh87@yahoo.comORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5847-7985
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».