Aphasia and acute care: a qualitative study of family perspectives
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background The early acute phase of hospitalization after the onset of aphasia is typically a challenging and stressful time for caregivers and family members of people with aphasia. During this time, it is particularly important to provide support and relevant information to family to reduce psychological distress and increase the likelihood of longer-term positive outcomes. However, families of people with aphasia often report a lack of support and information within the acute care setting and a generally negative experience.Aims To gather information and insights into the acute care experiences of families of people with aphasia as an early step in a larger project. The larger project was designed to improve the acute care experience for people with aphasia, families, and healthcare staff in a community teaching hospital.Methods A qualitative investigation including text-based questionnaires and in-person focus groups was conducted with 16 family members of people with aphasia. Thematic analysis was completed to identify experiences in early acute care. An additional 7 family members served as “checkers” to validate that the derived themes were consistent with their own experiences during acute hospitalization of their family member with aphasia.Results Six themes were identified that described shared experiences of the participants. The themes (drawing from quotes of participants) include: “At first it’s just survival”; “There’s nothing for the family”; “They did not use the word aphasia at the beginning”; “They did not give me any information about it [how to communicate]”; “They did not really communicate with him [the person with aphasia]”; “They do not want to give you hope”. The themes were endorsed by the family checkers.Conclusions This initial phase of a larger project found that participating families of people with aphasia were not given sufficient support or information, contributing to a largely negative experience of the early acute phase of care.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle