Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Liver fibrosis — a consequence of excess alcohol consumption, viral infection, metabolic dysfunction, disorders due to mutations in the genetic code, and autoimmunity (when the body’s immune system cannot distinguish between self and foreign), among many etiologies — has sickened people from paupers to princes for millennia. The aforegoing opinion reflects the timelessness of the causes of liver fibrosis as well as the commonality of its mechanisms. Only recently, however, has the mechanism of liver fibrosis begun to be understood. While this has been a decidedly nonlinear process of discovery, we find ourselves today considering fibrosis at length scales ranging from the nano- (derived from the Greek word νάνος nanos for dwarf) and implying a factor of 10−9, for example, a nanometer or one thousand millionth of a meter, to the meso- (from the Greek μεσαίο mesaio meaning intermediate) and the macro- (from Greek μακρός makrós for large) levels. Time scales range from milliseconds to days to decades. [Other extreme factors are 10−24 or yocto and 1024 for yotta, and as long as we are considering extraordinary dimensions of scale, it is amusing to recall that the proprietary name of the Internet search engine Google — a creative or accidental misspelling of googol for the number 10100 that signifies the large amount of information that can be retrieved — has become a generified verb, and yet the Google trademark has been legally upheld and so far, at least, has avoided genericide.] This review will provide a historical overview of liver fibrosis research, and then will highlight some of the key advances and most memorable and impactful publications in liver fibrosis in the modern era, particularly those most likely to impact the field through the next decades. LIVER FIBROSIS AND CIRRHOSIS IN THE PRE-MODERN AND MODERN ERAS: RECOGNITION AND NAMING Given the many etiologies of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis, including alcohol excess, it is certain that these pathological states have existed since antiquity. Greek physicians are credited with palpating the liver and recognizing hardening as abnormal; however, it wasn’t until the Renaissance that Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519) and Andreas Vesalius (1514–1564) carried out anatomical dissections of human livers, describing the appearance of cirrhosis and, in the case of Vesalius, linking it to excess alcohol consumption.1,2 In the modern era, the great anatomic pathologist and physician of Padua, Giovanni Battista Morgagni (1682–1771), father of the mechanistic approach to medicine and the use of autopsies to advance understanding of the disease,3,4 is credited with identifying liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in some of the more than 600 autopsies he reported in his 1761 book De sedibus, et causis morborum per anatomen indagatis (The Seats and Causes of Diseases Investigated by Anatomy) (Figure 1).4FIGURE 1: Frontispiece from Giovanni Battista Morgagni’s book, De sedibus et causis morborum per anatomen indagatis libri quinque. Venetiis: ex Thypographia Remondiniana; 1761.3 Available at the Open Library (https://openlibrary.org/)René Laennec gave cirrhosis its name after the Greek word κίρρωση kirrhosi, meaning tawny (orange-brown), in a footnote in an 1819 paper (De l’auscultation mediate) describing the physical signs of pulmonary diseases and the development of the stethoscope. More substantially, Laennec provided extensive descriptions of cirrhosis in an incomplete and only partially published manuscript (1804–1808), Treatise of Pathological Anatomy, that had been cited in an 1824 French medical dictionary5 and an 1839–1847 British Encyclopedia of Anatomy and Physiology6 — all of which is discussed in detail by Jacalyn M. Duffin,7 of the University of Ottawa, Canada. Cirrhosis was, however, first described across the English Channel by pathologists John Browne in 1685, in a treatise entitled “A liver appearing glandulous to the eye”8 and Matthew Baillie in 17939 but, strange to relate, he only published the accompanying illustrations (Figure 2) 6 years later.10 Cirrhosis and fibrosis were described histologically in the 18th and 19th centuries by, among others, Robert Carswell (1793–1857, Professor of Pathological Anatomy at the University College, London), who characterized cirrhosis as a state of atrophy with variable amounts and distribution of contractile fibrous tissue, cirrhotic nodules, and vascular compression (Figure 3).11 In the 20th century, the “Father of Hepatology,” Hans Popper (1903–1988, one of the founders of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases [AASLD]), further defined the pathological features of fibrosis and cirrhosis,12 notably in alcoholic and cholestatic liver disease, although his writings encompassed all of the major liver diseases and he was the first to describe capillarization of the sinusoids in chronic liver disease.13FIGURE 2: (A) John Browne’s illustration of a glandulous-appearing (ie, cirrhotic) liver. Key: Browne’s own upper case letters, A–G, are shown within the drawing of the cirrhotic liver itself): A, left lobe; B, concave part of the right lobe; C, cut surface of the right lobe; D, black spots, possibly representing divided vessels; E, gallbladder; F, portal vein together with the bile duct; G, liver tissue lying between the vena cava and the portal vein and bile duct; and H, vena cava.8 (B) Matthew Baillie’s illustration of a cirrhotic liver. From a series of engravings accompanied with explanations that are intended to illustrate the morbid anatomy of some of the most important parts of the human body, Fascicle 5, Plate II. A portion of the external surface (top) and cross-section (bottom) of the liver studded with tubercles. Line drawings by William Clift (John Hunter’s former assistant) and engraving by James Basire.10FIGURE 3: Plates from Carswell’s 1838 book Elementary Forms of Disease.11 (A) Plate shows various stages of cirrhosis in humans and (mid-right) a cow, with a human liver showing venous compression (bottom). The upper right shows the same liver, with lobules surrounded by fibrous tissue. (B) Section of the same human liver (above in A), showing atrophy and fibrous replacement.STERNZELLEN USHER IN THE 20th CENTURY AND A NEW ERA OF FIBROSIS RESEARCH While the great 19th and 20th century anatomists and pathologists provided landmark descriptions of fibrotic liver disease, it was in the late 19th century that Karl Wilhelm von Kupffer paved the way for the modern era of liver fibrosis research and specifically an understanding of the cell biology of the disease. In an 1876 letter to the anatomist Wilhelm von Waldeyer, von Kupffer provided the first description of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), which he called “Sternzellen” after staining dog liver sections with a gold chloride method in an unsuccessful attempt to identify nerve fibers (Figure 4).15,16 We now appreciate that the gold precipitation Kupffer observed was the result of vitamin A within the cells. Although Kupffer himself later concluded that these new cells were “special endothelial cells of the sinusoids,” he had suggested in his original description of Sternzellen that they were connective tissue cells (part of the perivascular connective tissue network, or “perivasculäre Bindgewebzellen” described by Waldeyer),17 a prescient view given our present understanding of stellate cells as pericytes with a critical role in liver fibrogenesis, and his report stands as the first to appreciate the unique localization and anatomy of the HSC.FIGURE 4: Kupffer’s drawing of Sternzellen in a dog liver, as stained by the gold chloride method.14After Kupffer’s initial description, HSCs (also known in the literature as fat-storing cells, lipocytes, and eponymously as Ito cells15) were found to be widespread in the liver and were reidentified many times as painstakingly detailed by Kenjiro Wake (Tokyo Medical and Dental University), and the German anatomist, pathologist, and histologist Karl Wilhelm Zimmerman (1861–1935), who highlighted their pericyte nature; Toshio Ito (1904–1991)15 who noting their fat storage called them “Fettspeicherungszellen”; and by Shinsuke Suzuki (who appreciated their interstitial nature).18 The most extraordinary descriptions of stellate cells after their original identification by Kupffer were from Wake (Figure 5), who used silver impregnation to visualize their extraordinarily complex cytoplasmic processes and their anatomic relationships to the hepatic sinusoid and other components of the liver microanatomy.18 Wake also contributed significantly to the field with detailed descriptions of the history of HSC research.16,18 The recognition that the varied concepts of HSCs were unified came with the agreement by 98 investigators in 1996 on the use of the term HSC as a unified nomenclature.20 Although there was significant initial disagreement in the field, the name is now widely used.15FIGURE 5: Images from Kenjiro Wake, showing: (A) The complexity of HSC processes and relationship to the sinusoid. (B) Rat HSC showing complex processes around sinusoids, Golgi silver method. Reprinted from Wake.19 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).THE GOLDEN AGE OF STELLATE CELLS What could be viewed as the “golden age” of HSCs years with descriptions from et (Figure and et describing to of stellate cells from and then from was appreciated that HSCs — to in the literature as or — on tissue or and that the cells and a of other components and of the fibrotic The that stellate cells were cells in the of of from in on the and of as by his former in the field of and of The role of stellate cells, as to other cells of the liver as Kupffer cells, and endothelial as of was however, a paper from then in the of at the University of that stellate cells, among the liver cell are to a for their role in HSCs from liver by the of that the and the due to the long Reprinted with from et a of in fibrosis research, as by the days of the in (Figure with significant in understanding the the many and factors the and the of by stellate cells. The research from this was by Professor of at the of at in in in a that to stellate cells as and cells of the of the most important of stellate cells, and the after of their is which and and other and the of and key incomplete that contributed to this in the late 20th century, in to those most of the in the liver fibrosis the of who contributed to understanding the and other factors by and stellate cell fibrogenesis, and in fibrosis of liver fibrosis as in a review from by Professor of of the University for Liver and and of at the University now at the University of Medical per in and from of the investigators who this of fibrosis research While — as a — and — as a — were the of initial research and are appreciated to be major of stellate cell there is a complex of between cells of the liver immune and a of and cells, and and among many now in great through cell and other at the in the and of is around the HSC research was stellate cells were by first paper as a was a review of stellate cells the the pathologist James Professor and of and and the and of at which was in to those stellate cells. in to hepatic stellate cells, vitamin cells are found the body, at stellate cells are now appreciated as key for the in and disease, with a particularly important role in LIVER FIBROSIS IN THE CENTURY The which term the of has the and of of the of also the of new — — research and and is a in fibrosis research and between and In of the it is that in many fibrosis and cirrhosis a characterized by cell and and that there are components of a liver fibrosis of tissue fibrosis in there are between fibrosis and and as by and in their on the the are the many for the of fibrotic diseases of the liver, including the and for chronic (Figure and the system for liver now metabolic liver to all of these is a on of the of other the the of cirrhosis, is in the history and of with liver as well as the for however, have to a new for the of and features of In a of investigators an of the to a more view of cirrhosis — that cirrhosis is variable in and vascular and biology — with cirrhosis divided on these the state of the In the Liver Study a that the term cirrhosis as to chronic liver be in of the term This new term can be further as significant portal is present discussed and has to the chronic liver a other and In with of of fibrosis and the with features of can be this new approach the of a more that an of the of of system for chronic Reprinted with from et these are they mechanistic it is a that the field has from a approach — at for the of liver fibrosis — to a more view that of and and a more and the of and other as well as various as for new are the of more of fibrosis and cirrhosis of the most advances in fibrosis in the modern era has been the around the of the century, that fibrosis is a process and that cirrhosis has the to liver fibrosis research in that fibrosis and cirrhosis were the on a The to in John and in reported that fibrosis in a could (Figure and suggested that HSC and together contributed to Although in the field at that and on of in the literature that with fibrosis could their was the by and was with a of cirrhosis that only than the years and of human fibrosis and was until years later that and in in the of in the in — with with et — that human cirrhosis could The shown in which review on be provided for the of cirrhosis in a with chronic the of of of liver as shown in John et landmark and stained after of the liver after days of with fibrous Reprinted with from et in a with chronic infection, after the first with The first (A) shows cirrhosis with (B) the shows of cirrhotic and the of In the there is Reprinted from et of American is now well — fibrosis from many including chronic infection, alcohol and in to of the can although many vascular there is a of to or a to for the The and of some of liver are to The of fibrosis are although there are and found in the paper from and University and Medical in a of cirrhosis, of to a in per significant in liver (Figure there was a significant in liver with of the fibrous and of the them and of While these were from the between the appearance of the in their and the human reported by et The and of these and a century after the from et and et of — in to and of — are than fibrosis in a The at fibrous at of after of Reprinted with from et new fibrosis at the however, have from that used and the same The of Robert and and of fibrosis in from the of of the cells to a state of to This which likely from has important and that who have fibrosis after of are at for fibrosis in the of an — a that also the between the and the in fibrosis The of fibrosis has been significant — and — research since the of the century to the of Although endothelial cells, and Kupffer cells are new cell in to have been at times portal first in are the most cells were viewed as in given their and to role is more than and there have been and from investigators the role of portal in this as a and considering for cell is likely a and portal as a significant cell in cholestatic cells have also had their in the cells from the to a to the liver after as shown by and suggested a role in fibrosis for cells from the of the The role of the in cells after liver has been the most The in one initial report suggested that were major to the an extraordinary amount of from many other to find in that this was the AND THE OF THE CENTURY Liver fibrosis research in the 19th and 20th centuries was for its first on anatomical descriptions of the liver as a tissue and then on the and of the cells and factors within the liver tissue. The century, in is for the new and of of the research carried out and for the of the length and scales is likely that many new to new and will be the The of the in fibrosis More than other the the and its with the liver have of liver disease. of the and most on the was published in by Robert and showing that the of through fibrosis and in in a in fibrosis with bile are in human liver it is now that there are — for the are a of that are — that in various parts of the and in a with the liver and that the portal and, as shown in the interstitial liver and The of the in is now known to fibrosis and has been in the of metabolic liver liver cirrhosis, hepatic and there are human and of as that We appreciate the of by which the and the liver — as by a of mechanistic at the of the in showing that all through a of to this is a that will be and one that will be in for and of the of by and by the to the in The in the of fibrosis in the century has been the of of the liver and — through and — to the in some the for liver the use of significantly understanding of the of to the mechanism of and there to be in the field of the of factors in In we in the that liver and that this was to fibrosis has since been in other including the and In this the of a relationship between and has been in the human be from these many liver cell have been shown to be HSCs and portal a for and (Figure and endothelial cells in a HSCs are also to as shown in a that a system to the of and More the and of cells of the liver and the role of in liver diseases illustrate the in the of liver at the for University of in that is the of a the of which will be a key of for to although the was found to be specifically in pathological including and in humans to of on has the of that a key in most of fibrosis in the can from the state in a HSCs showing of on of ranging from to The are for at can is Reprinted from et on the history of and in liver fibrosis be a of the of et (from the of University of showing a key role for the of in liver In to the this also a mechanism of fibrosis — across — that this the and the in the century has of liver fibrosis further than the and of the impact of the the of in and has to and in understanding to the in that result from in the from in including and by are now appreciated as major in liver cells and, liver of the most was from on in that to a in to liver fibrosis (Figure showing fibrosis in with of with A, or with D, that Reprinted with from et were also extraordinary advances in understanding the of liver fibrosis in the part of this A review from the a number of key genetic in liver disease, the that the field was in its and called for large In with the of the which had the extraordinarily of out of a and linking this information to disease, the of the a genetic to cirrhosis and liver disease, among others, have been cells of the liver with then to which has provided a view of the cell of the liver in as well as pathological including liver and In to identifying and cell including the have the identification of and between cells of the liver. which these to in the liver, as well as information from and is now the of liver including fibrosis and liver in who have significant in this among other significant HSC The of and the in liver fibrosis understanding in the field has been in its Although has been and likely will to be a significant to liver most of and have through the of the its to the of fibrosis etiologies and its — one of the most in modern B, and fibrosis are some of the that had to C, been by diseases in the which are the most and the most morbid liver diseases etiologies of fibrosis are likely to be a major of the next and causes in with and NEW liver fibrosis from While have the critical in the of with liver is on the research of the In fibrosis research, and with is also that the of various cell and to of cells in will be to this of and, more linking the other with the distribution of the of and and a new to these The complex of the and cells of the liver will become more as a result of these these the role of the processes around the sinusoid by HSCs — and the of these processes with cells and — be an of research and a While it is that our fibrosis are to and fibrosis after of the — most notably in C, also in and — in the a understanding of the role of the in of cirrhosis and the development of more to by and other are for those liver is the of and more than of the — or for those with diseases of as many of the has been a to be part of the liver fibrosis research for more than a century and to the extraordinary of our The new of the century an more to are in a in at and at and a at Medical and the — also in was a years was on the at that in liver fibrosis was and the of the University of of of of and In a after a on to of as a factor in liver it that our have than they since was fibrosis at and been on the at had left for years by other of liver stellate cells. had the to and with in was the in be to to Professor of of liver fibrosis and fibrogenesis, which this through the history of this that of is from all the varied cells in the liver, the and components of the liver and and their biology and to understanding of the most and there is a overview of hepatic a can be for the of those — — who be for a of the and since they as used as by and other The of known as are various in biology in the as and so at the and of of that the and of an or with the of large the The — as used in the of of as the and so which to a of some they are by from various Greek an in the of in the late 19th century as from — the of — of which were and as for this is the of a field or of at a more so large In to liver from to and own a in the in This will concepts from and with an on will be part of including important for as well as for and of a and a can only that the has
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».