MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4400287541 · doi:10.5194/epsc2024-1281

(469219) Kamo'oalewa, A Space-Weathering-Matured LL-chondrite-like Small NEA: Target of the Tianwen-2 Sample Return Mission

2024· preprint· en· W4400287541 sur OpenAlexaff
Pengfei Zhang, Yang Li, Guozheng Zhang, Xiaoran Yan, Yongxiong Zhang, Pierre Vernazza, E. A. Cloutis, T. Hiroi, Mikael Granvik, Xiaoping Zhang, Yangting Lin

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueAstro and Planetary Science
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Winnipeg
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChondriteSample (material)WeatheringSpace (punctuation)Space weatheringAstrobiologyChemistryGeologyGeochemistryPhysicsComputer scienceAsteroidMeteoriteOperating system

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Now, the China National Space Administration has proposed an asteroid mission, Tianwen-2, which plans to return a sample of a sub-hundred-meter Earth quasi-satellite (469219) 2016 HO3 Kamoʻoalewa. Early studies suggested Kamoʻoalewa originated from the Moon. However, here, we will report that Kamoʻoalewa is a space-weathering (SW)-matured LL-chondrite-like object.Results: We first determined the composition of Kamoʻoalewa by comparing Kamoʻoalewa’s reflectance spectrum (which was previously reported by [1]) with that of meteorites. As a result, Kamoʻoalewa shows an absorption center at 0.984 µm, only falling into the range of LL-chondrites. (Fig. 1), suggesting that Kamoʻoalewa resembles LL chondrites in composition rather than other meteorite types.Then we used an orbital dynamical calculation method [2] to trace the source region of Kamoʻoalewa. As a result, Kamoʻoalewa shows a probability of 72 ± 5% originating from the ν6 secular resonance. Given that Flora family adjacent to the ν6 secular resonance has been known as the major source region of LL-chondrite-like NEAs, such a high probability, therefore, emphasizes the possibility that Kamoʻoalewa is an LL-chondrite-like asteroid.Particularly, Kamoʻoalewa shows an extremely red spectral slope (0.726, calculated within 0.45-2.194 µm) when compare with NEAs and main belt asteroids (MBAs), implying that Kamoʻoalewa is a strongly space-weathered asteroid. Our nanosecond laser irradiation experiment on LL5/6 chondrite Kheneg Ljouâd’s powder has successfully produced a slightly redder spectrum than Kamoʻoalewa (Fig. 2), proving that Kamoʻoalewa’s extremely red-sloped spectrum can indeed be contributed by SW processes. Furthermore, employing the radiative transfer mixing model [3-4], our calculation suggests that 0.29 ± 0.05 wt.% SMFe0 (sub-microphase metallic iron, a major SW product that darkens and reddens silicate asteroids) in Kamoʻoalewa’s regolith is required. This is higher than the average content of SMFe0 in the regolith of Itokawa (~ 0.2 wt.% [5]), suggesting that Kamoʻoalewa is indeed a SW-matured object. This is also consistent with our taxonomy of Kamoʻoalewa as S-type rather than Sq- or Q-type.We also noted that Kamoʻoalewa’s spectrum is redder than the mean spectrum of its source region Flora family (which has an exposure age of 0.5-1 × 109 year). Given that the SW rate at 1 AU area is about 10 times that of the main belt area, Kamoʻoalewa’s SW timescale is hence estimated as at least 0.5-1 × 108 year. This exceeds the timescale of rapid reddening by solar wind irradiation (106 yr [6]) and the average dynamical lifetimes of NEAs (106 year [7]), indicating that Kamoʻoalewa broke as a fragment in the inner main belt very early and still retains most of the previous (non-near-Earth-space) SW information without significant later surface refreshing.We also estimated Kamoʻoalewa’s rotation period as ~27 min (meaning that it is a single rock), size as 69.45 m × 58.49 m × 51.78 m, and its regolith size on 75.38 % of surface area was lower than 2 cm, suggesting that fine-sized grains dominate Kamoʻoalewa’s surface. Meanwhile, when we assumed Kamoʻoalewa has been accelerated to current rotation period with a uniform angular acceleration within the Flora family, the estimation suggests that YORP spin-up lifetime is 4.23 × 104 to 4.23 × 105 yr. It means that the loss of large-sized grains (fresher) may have started very early and significant accumulation of small-sized grains/dust (maturer) has continued over a very long time (107 to 108 yr).Discussion: We explain that Kamoʻoalewa’s extremely red spectrum can be comprehensively contributed by long-term SW and weak resurface process: (1) long-term loss of young large-sized grains and the accumulation of mature small-sized materials, (2) small size of Kamoʻoalewa decreases the likelihood of surface refreshing caused by impact, (3) non-rubble pile structure may effectively avoid surface rejuvenation that would be driven by the inside-out movement of materials driven by spin-up and matter mixing driven by meteoroid impact, (4) Kamoʻoalewa did not underwent resurfacing by Earth encounters, because its minimum Earth orbit intersection distance (0.0345 AU) and perihelion (0.898 AU) is much larger than the range of Earth encounters (5-16 times Earth radius [8]), and quasi-satellites generally do not experience flybys with Earth as close as those observed for other co-orbital types.We further predict that sub-hundred-meter, rapidly spinning silicate-rich NEAs with small perihelion may generally exhibit redder spectral slopes and SW matured surfaces. This is different from the current observation that the “Q-type/S-type” ratio increases with decreasing perihelion distance [9-10].Fig. 1 Comparison of band I center and band area ratio (Band II/Band I) of Kamoʻoalewa with meteorites, the band I center of Kamoʻoalewa (0.984 µm) best matches to LL chondrites.Fig. 2 Comparison of spectra of Kamoʻoalewa with fresh (blue line) and laser irradiated (red line) LL5/6 chondrite Kheneg Ljouâd. After irradiation, Kheneg Ljouâd’s spectrum significantly steeps and slightly steeper than Kamoʻoalewa, suggesting that Kamoʻoalewa-like extremely red spectra can indeed be contributed by long-term SW processReference: [1] Sharkey et al. (2021) Commun Earth Environ, 2, 1-7. [2] Granvik and Brown (2018) Icarus, 311, 271-287. [3] Lawrence et al. (2007) JGR: Planets, 112. [4] Lucey et al. (2011) Icarus, 212, 451-462. [5] Binzel et al. (2001) Meteorit Planet Sci, 36, 1167-1172. [6] Vernazza et al. (2009) Nature, 458, 993-995. [7] Nesvorný et al. (2017) AJ, 155, 42. [8] Nesvorný et al. (2010) Icarus, 209, 510-519. [9] Binzel et al. (2019) Icarus, 324, 41-76. [10] Demeo et al. (2023) Icarus, 389, 115264. [11] Demeo et al. (2009) Icarus, 202, 160-180.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,015

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,220
Écart entre enseignants0,206 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetAstro and Planetary ScienceTravaux en français237 207