MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4400290037 · doi:10.5194/epsc2024-775

Experimental results on the H2-H2 and H2-He collisional-induced absorption coefficients at typical Jupiter’s upper tropospheric conditions.  

2024· preprint· en· W4400290037 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Francesca Vitali, Stefania Stefani, G. Piccioni, D. Grassi, Marcel Snels

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueAstro and Planetary Science
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésJupiter (rocket family)Absorption (acoustics)PhysicsTroposphereChemistryAtomic physicsAtmospheric sciencesOpticsAstronomy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Jupiter’s atmosphere is primarily composed of molecular hydrogen and helium.Since the atmosphere of this gaseous giant represents a high-density environment, the H2 Collision Induced Absorption (CIA) fundamental band represents one of the main sources of opacity in the infrared part of the spectrum, particularly between 1 and 5 μm, which is a spectral range widely used by remote sensing instruments.For this reason, it is important to have experimental data on the CIA absorption and to compare them with the theoretical models present in the literature, to have an estimation as accurate as possible of Jupiter’s atmospheric opacity, which represents important information for the already deployed Juno and Juice missions.Consequently, measurements of the hydrogen CIA fundamental band have been performed in a wide range of temperature and pressure conditions, including the Jovian upper-tropospheric ones.We performed measurements using a pure H2 gas and an H2-He mixture at typical Jovian concentrations (13.6% of He) and for different mixing ratios.We used an experimental setup called PASSxS (Planetary Atmosphere Simulation for Spectroscopy) [1], which allows us to record spectra in the spectral range from 1 to 5 μm.It comprises two stainless steel concentric vessels, as shown in Figure 1. The inner one contains the gaseous mixture under investigation, while the external can be evacuated to ensure thermal insulation of the sample chamber from the external environment.Moreover, the inner vessel contains a multipass cell coupled with an FT-IR spectrometer. It has been aligned to reach an optical path of 3.27 m. The spectral resolution of the FT-IR ranges from 0.06 to 10 cm-1. For a more detailed description of the experimental setup refer to [1].Figure 1: a graphical sketch of the PASSxSThanks to this experimental setup we obtained some high signal-to-noise ratio measurements in a temperature range that goes from 120K to 500K. Figure 2 shows the experimental binary absorption coefficients for a pure H2 gas in this temperature range. These are the first experimental measurements of the CIA H2 fundamental band at temperatures higher than 300K.Figure 2: Pure H2 binary absorption coefficients in the [120, 500] K temperature rangeMoreover, we studied the H2 CIA fundamental band for an H2-He mixture for various He concentrations, from a minimum of 13.6% of He (Jovian concentration) to a maximum of 90% of He. Figure 3 shows the absorption coefficients obtained for the mixture of interest with a He concentration that goes from 0% (pure H2 case) to 70% at room temperature. The measurements have been taken by inserting an initial H2 pressure of 6 bar, and different He pressures.As you can see, as the He concentration increases, the peak around 4200 cm-1 becomes more pronounced.Figure 3: Experimental absorption coefficients at room temperature for an H2-He mixture at different He concentrations, for an initial H2 pressure of 6 barStarting from the measurements acquired with the H2-He mixture at a certain temperature, it is also possible to separate the contributions to the total absorption coefficients due to the H2-H2 and the H2-He collisions, which are shown in Figure 4.This allows us to re-calculate the absorption coefficients for any mixing ratio, and possibly study the opacity in this spectral range of any gaseous planet whose atmosphere is predominantly made of H2 and He.Figure 4: Absorption coefficients at room temperature for the H2-H2 (blue curve) and H2-He (green curve) contributions. The red curves represent Abel's theoretical models [3]Furthermore, using the typical Jovian He concentration we also performed measurements at three pressure and temperature conditions, chosen along Jupiter’s atmospheric profile shown in Figure 5. The three dots superimposed on the curve represent the chosen set points.Figure 5: Jovian atmospheric profile [2]Figure 6 shows the experimental absorption coefficients (blue curve) acquired for an H2-He mixture for typical Jovian concentrations at 402 K and a pressure of 19.2 bar.The band shows a maximum absorption around 4200 cm-1 where the absorption coefficients reach a value of almost 5.8 10-4 cm-1.Furthermore, the experimental data have been compared with Abel’s theoretical model [3] shown as the red curve. As one can see, there are some discrepancies between the data and the model, which should be investigated further.Figure 6: Experimental absorption coefficients (blue curve) at typical Jupiter's upper-tropospheric conditions. The red curve represents Abel’s theoretical model [3]Looking at the left side of the main peak of the band shown in Figure 6, it is easy to notice the presence of some tiny features called interference dips [4] not reproduced by the theoretical model.They have been studied by acquiring some high-resolution spectra for a pure H2 gas and an H2-He mixture at room temperature for different pressure conditions.The interference dips represent a lack of absorption at specific wavelengths.We managed to resolve all four interference dips observed at the following wavenumbers: 4126 cm-1, 4143 cm-1, 4155 cm-1 and 4161 cm-1.Acknowledgments: This work has been developed under the ASI-INAF agreement n. 2023-6-HH.0.References:[1] M. Snels and al. (2021), AMT 14, 7187–7197, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7187-2021.[2] A. Seiff (1997), Science Vol 276, pp.102-104,https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.276.5309.102.[3] M. Abel et al., (2012), The Journal of Chemical Physics, 136,https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3676405[4] J. Van Kranendonk (1968), Canadian Journal of Physics Vol. 46, N. 10, https://doi.org/10.1139/p68-150.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,010

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,289
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetAstro and Planetary Science→Travaux en français237 207→