MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4400296403 · doi:10.1093/humrep/deae108.655

P-288 How do pregnancy complications, intrapartum, and neonatal risks differ in bicornuate and didelphys uteri. A population-based study

2024· article· en· W4400296403 sur OpenAlexaff
Shahad S. Alharazi, Maya Dahan, Ahmad Badeghiesh, Haitham Baghlaf

Notice bibliographique

RevueHuman Reproduction · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Établissements canadiensMcGill University Health Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBicornuate uterusUterus didelphysObstetricsMedicineGynecologyPopulationPregnancyBiologyUterusInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Study question Are there differences between didelphys and bicornuate uteri regarding obstetrical and neonatal outcomes based on an analysis of a population database? Summary answer Didelphys uteri present higher risks of preeclampsia, preterm delivery, PPROM, and cesarean delivery; while bicornuate uteri present higher risks of placenta previa, and placental abruption. What is known already Didelphys and bicornuate uteri are similar congenital anomalies with duplication of the uterine corpus. It is thought that both defects are similar when it comes to pregnancy complications, with increased risks of preterm delivery (PTD), malpresentation, and cesarean delivery, when compared to women without uterine anomalies. The didelphys uterus has two cervixes and a double vagina while the bicornuate uterus has one cervix and a single vagina. This minor difference may or may not alter the risks of pregnancy complications in these groups. However, obstetric and perinatal outcomes for didelphys and bicornuate uteri have never been directly compared. Study design, size, duration This retrospective population-based cohort study utilized data from the Healthcare-Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) from 2010 to 2014, inclusively. There were 3,846,342 births between 2010 and 2014, 1146 women with didelphys uteri and 6327 women with bicornuate uteri were included in the database and the study. Women were included only once per pregnancy. Participants/materials, setting, methods HCUP-NIS is the largest inpatient database in the USA and is comprised of hospitalizations throughout the USA. It provides information relating to seven-million inpatient stays yearly, includes 20% of admissions, and represents over 96% of Americans. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to explore associations between bicornuate uteri and delivery outcomes while controlling for confounding effects. According to the Tri-Council Policy Statement (2018), IRB approval was not required, given data was anonymous and publicly available. Main results and the role of chance No significant difference was seen between the groups in regard to age, income, medical insurance plan, rates of obesity, illicit drug use, chronic hypertension, diabetes, thyroid disease, HIV, tobacco smoking during pregnancy, previous cesareans, pregnancy from IVF, and multiple gestations (P > 0.05). The only difference was in racial distribution, which was controlled for in the subsequent analysis (p < 0.05).In comparison to pregnant women with bicornuate uteri, patients with didelphys uteri were more likely to experience preeclampsia (aOR 1.38 95%CI: 1.05-1.80 P = 0.020), preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (aOR 1.76 95%CI1.32-2.34 P = 0.000), preterm delivery (aOR 1.39 95% CI1.18-1.64P=0.000), and higher chances of cesarean delivery (aOR 1.41 95% CI1.20-1.64 P = 0.000), after controlling for confounding demographics. Additionally, women with didelphys uteri have less risks of developing placenta previa (aOR 0.26 95%CI: 0.08-0.84 P = 0.024) and Abruptio placenta (aOR 0.52 95%CI 0.31-0.87 P = 0.013). No significant difference was seen between the groups regarding pregnancy induced hypertension, eclampsia, gestational diabetes, chorioamnionitis, operative vaginal delivery, hysterectomy, post-partum hemorrhage, wound complications, blood transfusion, maternal death, maternal infection, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism or DIC (P > 0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference between the two groups when comparing neonatal outcomes, including small for gestational age fetuses and intrauterine fetal demise (P > 0.05). Limitations, reasons for caution The limitation of our study are related to its retrospective nature and use of administrative database, which relies on the accuracy, and consistency of the individual coding the data, and the masking of undetected bias. Wider implications of the findings The present study demonstrates that women with bicornuate and didelphys uteri have certain differences when it comes to pregnancy, and intrapartum complications, including rates of preeclampsia, placenta previa, placental abruption, cesarean section, PPROM, and preterm delivery. These findings emphasize the importance of individualized perinatal care in these two cases. Trial registration number not applicable

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,211
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,391

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,084
Tête enseignante GPT0,387
Écart entre enseignants0,303 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHuman ReproductionMême sujetMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsTravaux en français237 207