P-288 How do pregnancy complications, intrapartum, and neonatal risks differ in bicornuate and didelphys uteri. A population-based study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Study question Are there differences between didelphys and bicornuate uteri regarding obstetrical and neonatal outcomes based on an analysis of a population database? Summary answer Didelphys uteri present higher risks of preeclampsia, preterm delivery, PPROM, and cesarean delivery; while bicornuate uteri present higher risks of placenta previa, and placental abruption. What is known already Didelphys and bicornuate uteri are similar congenital anomalies with duplication of the uterine corpus. It is thought that both defects are similar when it comes to pregnancy complications, with increased risks of preterm delivery (PTD), malpresentation, and cesarean delivery, when compared to women without uterine anomalies. The didelphys uterus has two cervixes and a double vagina while the bicornuate uterus has one cervix and a single vagina. This minor difference may or may not alter the risks of pregnancy complications in these groups. However, obstetric and perinatal outcomes for didelphys and bicornuate uteri have never been directly compared. Study design, size, duration This retrospective population-based cohort study utilized data from the Healthcare-Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) from 2010 to 2014, inclusively. There were 3,846,342 births between 2010 and 2014, 1146 women with didelphys uteri and 6327 women with bicornuate uteri were included in the database and the study. Women were included only once per pregnancy. Participants/materials, setting, methods HCUP-NIS is the largest inpatient database in the USA and is comprised of hospitalizations throughout the USA. It provides information relating to seven-million inpatient stays yearly, includes 20% of admissions, and represents over 96% of Americans. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to explore associations between bicornuate uteri and delivery outcomes while controlling for confounding effects. According to the Tri-Council Policy Statement (2018), IRB approval was not required, given data was anonymous and publicly available. Main results and the role of chance No significant difference was seen between the groups in regard to age, income, medical insurance plan, rates of obesity, illicit drug use, chronic hypertension, diabetes, thyroid disease, HIV, tobacco smoking during pregnancy, previous cesareans, pregnancy from IVF, and multiple gestations (P > 0.05). The only difference was in racial distribution, which was controlled for in the subsequent analysis (p < 0.05).In comparison to pregnant women with bicornuate uteri, patients with didelphys uteri were more likely to experience preeclampsia (aOR 1.38 95%CI: 1.05-1.80 P = 0.020), preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (aOR 1.76 95%CI1.32-2.34 P = 0.000), preterm delivery (aOR 1.39 95% CI1.18-1.64P=0.000), and higher chances of cesarean delivery (aOR 1.41 95% CI1.20-1.64 P = 0.000), after controlling for confounding demographics. Additionally, women with didelphys uteri have less risks of developing placenta previa (aOR 0.26 95%CI: 0.08-0.84 P = 0.024) and Abruptio placenta (aOR 0.52 95%CI 0.31-0.87 P = 0.013). No significant difference was seen between the groups regarding pregnancy induced hypertension, eclampsia, gestational diabetes, chorioamnionitis, operative vaginal delivery, hysterectomy, post-partum hemorrhage, wound complications, blood transfusion, maternal death, maternal infection, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism or DIC (P > 0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference between the two groups when comparing neonatal outcomes, including small for gestational age fetuses and intrauterine fetal demise (P > 0.05). Limitations, reasons for caution The limitation of our study are related to its retrospective nature and use of administrative database, which relies on the accuracy, and consistency of the individual coding the data, and the masking of undetected bias. Wider implications of the findings The present study demonstrates that women with bicornuate and didelphys uteri have certain differences when it comes to pregnancy, and intrapartum complications, including rates of preeclampsia, placenta previa, placental abruption, cesarean section, PPROM, and preterm delivery. These findings emphasize the importance of individualized perinatal care in these two cases. Trial registration number not applicable
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».