MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4400296634 · doi:10.1093/humrep/deae108.267

O-228 Do myomectomies decrease third trimester pregnancy complications when compared to women without myomectomies and uterine fibroids in situ? A study of an American population database

2024· article· en· W4400296634 sur OpenAlexaff
Perrine Ginod, Ahmad Badeghiesh, Haitham Baghlaf, Michael H. Dahan

Notice bibliographique

RevueHuman Reproduction · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueUterine Myomas and Treatments
Établissements canadiensMcGill Genome Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPregnancyObstetricsMedicineGynecologyPopulationBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Study question Myomectomies are performed to decrease pregnancy complications, among other indications, however, do myomectomies decrease third trimester pregnancy complications? Summary answer Post-myomectomy, pregnancies experienced more complications including hypertensive disorders, premature-pre-term-rupture of membranes, preterm-delivery, placenta-previa, cesareans, uterine ruptures, wound complications, transfusions, and small for gestational age infants. What is known already Patients with fibroid uterus experience reduced fertility rates and increased in obstetrical complications compared to patients without fibroids. If the removal of fibroids improves fertility is controversial for intramural fibroids, it is recommended for submucosal fibroids by the American College Of Gynaecology guidelines. It is a common, untested belief that myomectomies may reduce the risks of certain obstetrics complications. While rates of mal-placentation and hypertensive disorders may increase post-myomectomy as shown by the literature comparing myomectomy vs. control groups without fibroids, other complications may be anticipated to decrease. However, no population-based studies have attempted to answer this question. Study design, size, duration Retrospective cohort study, using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2004 and 2014, inclusively, based on International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition, diagnoses (ICD-9). Data collected from 48 states and the District of Columbia, representing 20% of annual hospital admissions in the United States. Population-based study, including 89,025 with uterine fibroids: 7508 pregnancies with previous abdominal myomectomy (AM) or laparoscopic myomectomy (LM), and 81,517 controls with uterine fibroids in-situ, without myomectomies. Participants/materials, setting, methods We included patients delivery discharge diagnoses or maternal deaths, and with either uterine fibroids (ICD-9 codes 218.0, 218.1, 218.2, 218.9) or AM or LM prior to the pregnancy, (ICD-9 codes 68.29 and 68.19 or CPT procedure code 58140, 58145, 58146, 58545 and 58546). Binomial logistic regression was used and adjusted for age, race, income quartiles, smoking, previous cesarean section, chronic and pregnancy-induced hypertension, obesity, multiple gestations, pre-gestational and gestational diabetes mellitus. Main results and the role of chance The myomectomy group was characterized by older patients, higher rates of Caucasian race, chronic hypertension, previous cesarean delivery, and multiple gestations, and lower, income quartiles, rates of obesity, compared to the fibroid in-situ group (P < 0.05). There was no difference for rates of medical insurance plan type, tobacco smoking, pregestational diabetes, illicit drug use, thyroid disease, or in vitro fertilization use (P > 0.05, all). The myomectomy group had increased rates of pregnancy-induced hypertension (adjusted odd ratios(aOR)-1.15, 95% confidence intervals(CI):1.06-1.26), preeclampsia (aOR:1.25 95%CI:1.12-1.41), preterm delivery (aOR:1.4, 95%CI:1.27-1.53), preterm premature rupture of membranes (aOR:1.29, 95%CI:1.05-1.58), placenta previa (aOR:1.59, 95%CI:1.32-1.92), cesarean delivery (aOR:37.1, 95%CI:27.35-50.4), uterine rupture (aOR:2.1, 95%CI:1.06-4.16), blood transfusion (aOR:1.21, 95%CI:1.68-2.24), wound complications (aOR:1.44, 95%CI:1.1-1.9), disseminated intravascular coagulation (aOR:1.58, 95%CI:1.1-2.27), and small for gestational age (SGA) infants (aOR:0,19, 95%CI:1.05-1.39) compared to the fibroid in-situ group. The myomectomy group had a lower rate of gestational diabetes mellitus (aOR:0,88, 95%CI:0,79-0,97), chorioamnionitis (aOR:0,74, 95%CI:0,6-0,93), maternal infection (aOR:0.79, 95%CI:0.65-0.95), spontaneous (aOR:0.03, 95%CI:0.02-0.04) and operative vaginal delivery (aOR:0.87, 95%CI:0.75-0.99), and postpartum hemorrhage (aOR:0.73, 95%CI:0.62-0.87). There was no significant differences for rates of gestational hypertension, eclampsia, preeclampsia or eclampsia superimposed on pre-existing hypertension, abruptio placenta, hysterectomy, maternal death, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and venous thromboembolism events (P > 0.05, all). Limitations, reasons for caution The retrospective nature of the study may mask undetected bias. Moreover, although the rate of uterine rupture was increased in the myomectomy group, it was rare and requires confirmation. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the outcomes in pregnancy after myomectomy. Wider implications of the findings The complications seen after myomectomies were likely related to uterine-incisions and alteration of myometrial vascularization, impairing trophectoderm invasion and leading to hypertensive disorders, mal-placentation, and abnormalities of fetal growth. Patients should be counselled regarding these potential risks. Increased understanding of the role of myomectomies on reproductive outcomes needs further study. Trial registration number not applicable

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,158
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,713

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,354
Écart entre enseignants0,316 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHuman ReproductionMême sujetUterine Myomas and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207