P-752 Association between obesity in women with multiple gestations and adverse obstetric outcomes: a study of an American population database with over 136,000 unique deliveries
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Study question The purpose of this study is to compare obese and non-obese women with multiple pregnancies to determine the effects on pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes. Summary answer Obesity and multiple gestations are independent risk factors for adverse obstetric outcomes. Combined, obesity in multiple gestation increases risk of maternal, delivery, and neonatal complications. What is known already Obesity is a pandemic and multiple pregnancies are a known consequence of assisted reproductive technologies. Obese women (body mass index [BMI] >30kg/m2) are at higher risk of hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes, fetal growth complications, stillbirth, preterm birth, labour complications, caesarean deliveries, wound infection, venous thromboembolism, and adverse neonatal outcomes. Multiple gestation is associated with greater obstetric risks, including miscarriage, preterm birth, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders, operative delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, congenital anomalies, and fetal growth restriction. The combined effects are not well-established. Study design, size, duration We conducted a retrospective population-based study utilizing data collected between 2004 and 2014 inclusively, from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample. We evaluated deliveries using the international classification of diseases [ICD], ninth edition, clinical modification codes for delivery-related discharge diagnosis and birth-related procedural diagnosis. All women with a diagnosis of multiple pregnancies were selected. They were subsequently divided based on the ICD-9 code for obesity. A total of 137,303 multiple pregnancies were analyzed. Participants/materials, setting, methods Within the 137,303 multiple pregnancies, 130,542 (95%) were non-obese, while 6,761 (5%) were obese. An initial analysis was performed to identify the prevalence of obesity in women with multiple pregnancies. We then compared baseline clinical and demographic characteristics between women with obesity to those without obesity using chi-squared tests. Subsequently, binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore comparisons between the obese and non-obese groups while adjusting for the potential confounding effects. Main results and the role of chance Over the 11-year study period, there was a statistically significant increase in prevalence of obesity for women with multiple gestations (p < 0.0001). The obese group was at higher risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension (adjusted odd’s ratio [aOR]=1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.77-2.02), gestational hypertension (aOR=1.84, CI = 1.65-2.05), preeclampsia (aOR=1.68, CI = 1.55-1.81), preeclampsia or eclampsia superimposed on pre-existing hypertension (aOR=1.86, CI = 1.58-2.20), gestational diabetes mellitus (aOR=2.65, CI = 2.44-2.87), and placenta previa (aOR=0.57, CI = 0.39-0.85). They were more likely to have preterm premature rupture of membranes (aOR=1.19, CI = 1.06-1.34), chorioamnionitis (aOR=1.24, CI = 1.03-1.51), caesarean sections (aOR=1.28, CI = 1.18-1.38), wound complications (aOR=1.65, CI = 1.31-2.08), and transfusions (aOR=0.77, CI = 0.67-0.89). They were less likely to have small for gestational age neonates (aOR=0.88, CI = 0.79-0.97), though more likely to have neonates with congenital anomalies (aOR=1.56, CI = 1.16-2.10). Conversely, for certain factors, the outcomes were similar between obese and non-obese women with multiple gestation including rates of eclampsia (p = 0.07), abruptio placenta (p = 0.82), hysterectomy (p = 0.36), postpartum hemorrhage (p = 0.08), maternal death (p = 0.98), maternal infection (p = 0.10), deep vein thrombosis (p = 0.17), pulmonary embolism (p = 0.75), venous thromboembolism (p = 0.15), disseminated intravascular coagulation (p = 0.85) and intrauterine fetal demise (p = 0.52). Limitations, reasons for caution The database is retrospective and relies on hospitals reporting elevated body mass index, which may not always be consistently recognized, potentially resulting in an underestimation of the total number of obese women. However, this only stands to support the increased risks detected in this study as being legitimate. Wider implications of the findings We addresses a significant gap in the literature by simultaneously exploring the impacts of multiple pregnancies and maternal obesity on obstetric complications. This can guide clinical practice, encouraging single embryo transfer in obese women undergoing in-vitro fertilization and tailored care for obese patients with multiple pregnancies, anticipating the associated risks. Trial registration number not applicable
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».