P-272 Cannabis negatively impacts female fertility: an in vitro and clinical investigation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Study question How does tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) impacts human oocyte maturation and female fertility? Summary answer THC alters the oocyte’s RNA profile and affects meiotic spindle formation resulting in an increased rate of aneuploidy in the oocyte and in the blastocyst. What is known already In the past decades, cannabis consumption and legalization has been increasing globally. It is the third most used substance by reproductive aged people and our group demonstrated that tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) reaches the ovarian follicle. THC is known to impact male fertility, but due to the challenges associated with investigating the female gamete in humans, there is no study about the human oocyte. Animal studies have shown that THC impacts oocyte maturation in a concentration dependent manner, but between models, the results are conflicting. Study design, size, duration For the in vitro exposure assessment, GV oocytes naïve to THC were collected from consenting patients undergoing IVF-ICSI from July 2022 to June 2024 (IRB: Veritas #16518). Per patient, oocytes were split into three groups: Control, THC1 (physiological concentration of THC, based on previous human studies) and THC2 (supra-physiological concentration, based on animal studies), and cultured for 24h in our standard clinical in vitro maturation media. Participants/materials, setting, methods Single-cell RNAseq and pathway analysis were conducted to identify key pathways altered by THC treatments (n = 86 from 24 patients). Spindle morphology was assessed using confocal microscopy. Polar body biopsy was performed and ploidy assessed using our clinical low pass whole genome sequencing pipeline. Also, we conducted a multi-year retrospective study (n = 1059 patients) by measuring the concentration of THC in their follicular fluid by mass spectrometry and collecting and comparing IVF outcomes between cases and controls. Main results and the role of chance In vitro, THC treatment marginally increased the maturation rate (46% for Ctrl (n = 103), 51% for THC1 (n = 103) and 58% for THC2 (n = 102)). Using time-lapse imaging, no difference was observed between key developmental stages of oocyte maturation including GVBD and polar body extrusion. Single-cell RNAseq revealed significant alterations to the transcriptome profile of THC treated oocytes. When treated with THC1 (physiological concentration), 89 upregulated and 227 downregulated genes were identified, this was exaggerated when treated with THC2 (supraphysiologic concentration) 402 upregulated and 62 downregulated genes were identified. Pathway analysis showed that differentially expressed genes in THC1 group were associated with immune system and synaptic transmission, while THC2 group showed genes enriched in meiotic spindle formation and apoptosis. Moreover, preliminary results demonstrated abnormal spindle configuration and misaligned chromosomes in THC-treated groups and a concurrent decrease in the number of euploid oocytes. Furthermore, retrospective analysis of clinical IVF outcomes revealed that patients whose FF was positive for THC (62 patients, 6%) also had a slight increased maturation rate (77% vs 73%, p=ns), but a significant reduction of their embryo euploid rate when compared to control patients (59% vs 70%, p < 0.01). Limitations, reasons for caution The in vitro exposure to THC utilized GV oocytes that did not mature after ovarian stimulation, so they might have a reduced capacity of becoming MII. The THC measurement was assessed only on the day of retrieval and we do not know the route, dose, or duration of THC consumption. Wider implications of the findings This is the first study investigating the impact of cannabis on human oocytes. Our data suggests that cannabis consumption may reduce the number of euploid embryos available for transfer. With cannabis legalization increasing worldwide, further investigation into its consequences is critical for clinical consultation and legalization guidelines. Trial registration number Not applicable
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».