O-311 Oncological treatments have limited effects on the fertility prognosis in testicular cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Study question What is the prevalence of infertility defined by azoospermia, failure to achieve paternity or the usage of cryosperm after oncological treatments in testicular cancer? Summary answer The overall prevalence of infertility (95% CI) is 14% (9-21%) after all therapy types and 4% (2-10%) in a pooled subgroup of good-prognosis patients. What is known already Testicular cancer is the most common solid tumor among young men in the reproductive phase between 15 and 45 years. More than 95% of the patients become long-term survivors and up to 77% of cancer survivors report an interest in paternity after completing cancer treatment. Most guidelines recommend that physicians should counsel their patients about sperm cryopreservation before initiating gonadotoxic therapy. However, few studies have assessed fertility parameters after testicular cancer therapies over the last twenty years. Thus, this very first meta-analysis in a large pooled study population of patients functions as the best approximation of fertility prognosis so far. Study design, size, duration The systematic review and meta-analysis is part of the FertiTOX project (www.fertitox.com) which aims to close the gap of data regarding gonadotoxicity of cancer therapies to enable more accurate counselling regarding fertility preservation. It was performed on all published studies since 2000 that have reported the prevalence of azoospermia, the failure to achieve a pregnancy over 12 months of regular unprotected sexual intercourse or the usage of cryosperm after oncological treatments of unilateral testicular cancer. Participants/materials, setting, methods A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase and Cochrane in December 2022. For the systematic review, studies with men after all types of unilateral testicular cancer were included. For the meta-analysis, studies with unspecified treatments, < 10 patients for outcome evaluation or rare tumours were excluded. Infertility was defined as azoospermia, failure to achieve paternity or the usage of cryosperm. The quality of the individual studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Main results and the role of chance A total of 126 studies remained following screening of the abstracts and fulltext for the subject of the study. Of these, 30 studies including 13718 men with a history of unilateral testicular cancer were eligible and analysed for qualitative synthesis. Sample sizes ranged from 17 to 4846 patients with a follow-up from 1-30 (mean 6.5) years. Histology included seminomas (43.9%), non-seminomas (49.6%) and sex cord or stromal tumors (0.01%). Treatment comprised active surveillance after unilateral orchidectomy (32.7%), radiotherapy (23.1%), standard or low-dose chemotherapy (33.7%) and high-dose chemotherapy (1.4%). Spermiograms after treatment were analysed in 17 studies. A quantitative synthesis was performed in 23 studies. To account for heterogeneity observed among studies, a random-effects model was used to estimate the prevalence and its 95% CI. The overall pooled prevalence of infertility (95% CI) in men with unilateral testicular cancer after standard oncological treatment was 14% (9-21%). Azoospermia after all types of oncological treatments appeared in 8% (6-12%) of the pooled study population. For good-prognosis patients who received standard therapy (i.e. surgery with or without retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, low- or standard dosed platin-based chemotherapy up to four cycles and / or radiotherapy), the overall prevalence of infertility was only 4% (2-10%). Limitations, reasons for caution First, the majority of the studies based on either questionnaire or register data with evident selection bias. Second, further subgroup analysis was impossible due to predominantly mixed treatment cohorts allowing only an approximation of standard therapy effects. Third, infertility might have occurred due to factors besides the oncological therapy. Wider implications of the findings Our meta-analysis includes all men with fertility outcome after testicular cancer therapy. Despite the overall low prevalence of infertility, sperm cryopreservation should still be recommended since it is unclear which therapy will follow after surgery and since there is no large longitudinal data for the various individual treatment effects. Trial registration number PROSPERO (Registry number CRD42023384057)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».