Impact of Ethical Procurement Practices in Enhancing Corporate Reputation and Stakeholder Trust in Canada
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purpose: The aim of the study was to examine the Impact of ethical procurement practices in enhancing corporate reputation and stakeholder trust in Canada Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The study found that companies in Canada that adopt ethical procurement practices are socially responsible, which greatly enhances their reputation among consumers, investors, and the broader community. This positive perception is critical in a market where stakeholders are increasingly vigilant about corporate ethics. Moreover, ethical procurement practices foster trust among stakeholders, including suppliers, customers, employees, and regulatory bodies. By ensuring transparency and fairness in their procurement processes, companies can build stronger, more reliable relationships with their suppliers, leading to more stable and resilient supply chains. Additionally, consumers are more likely to remain loyal to brands that demonstrate a commitment to ethical sourcing, which can lead to increased market share and profitability. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Stakeholder Theory, Institutional Theory & Institutional Theory may be used to anchor future studies on Impact of ethical procurement practices in enhancing corporate reputation and stakeholder trust in Canada. Implement integrated ethical frameworks that incorporate procurement strategies aligned with sustainability, diversity, and social responsibility goals. Organizations can enhance practice by embedding ethical considerations into supply chain management processes and supplier relationships. Foster proactive stakeholder engagement to communicate ethical procurement initiatives transparently. This practice not only builds trust but also aligns organizational values with stakeholder expectations, enhancing reputation and credibility. Advocate for policies that promote ethical procurement standards and incentivize businesses to adopt transparent and accountable sourcing practices. Clear regulatory frameworks can provide guidance and support for organizations seeking to integrate ethical considerations into their procurement policies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle