Innovating for the Future of Careers: Innovative Pathways for Researching Sustainable Careers
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In a context of rapid and disruptive change, there is a need for innovations in the way careers are being conceived, researched and managed. In recent years, the topic of sustainable careers has received increased interest from scholars as a promising perspective to understand contemporary careers, as evidenced by various academic publications. Sustainable careers research focuses on the dynamic interplay of person, context, and time to study how person-career fit can enhance the long-term sustainability (i.e., happiness, health, and productivity) and success of people’s careers. Recent research has applied the sustainable career model to, for example, the challenges of career sustainability for different groups of workers, the processes involved in career sustainability over time, and the interplay of multiple stakeholders in different contexts affecting sustainable careers. However, there is a need for further (critical) examination of the key relationships between context, person and time in affecting career sustainability as well as in the meaning of and interplay between its key indicators (health, happiness, productivity). There is a need to further develop and expand existing models with more specific concepts to allow for targeted empirical research testing the basic principles of career sustainability. Therefore, this symposium brings together five state-of-the-art research projects that each add a valuable phenomenon that expands and deepens the model of sustainable careers: (1) digitization, (2) multiple job holding, (3) career empowerment, (4) career sacrifice, and (5) sustainable career orientation. The first paper addresses the pertinent challenges for careers brought along by rapid digitization and provides a comprehensive review of empirical studies addressing how the increase in various types of digital tools impacts individuals' career trajectories. In the second paper, the enriching versus depleting impact of multiple jobholding on career sustainability is explored through a qualitative study, thereby considering the dimensions of person, context and time. The third paper builds upon the interplay between person and context and addresses the role of the leader in stimulating career empowerment as a vehicle for career sustainability. The fourth paper takes a sensemaking perspective to theorize about career sacrifice valuation as a process which may explain whether and how unconventional and sometimes imperfect decisions may still lead to sustainable careers over time. In the fifth paper, the concept of sustainable career orientations is introduced and operationalized via a scale validation study, aimed to further our understanding of who might be more or less likely to focus on establishing high levels of career sustainability. Taken together, the five papers included in this symposium provide new insights into the meaning of sustainable careers, offering suggestions for further refinement, adaptations, and empirical examination. Digitalization and Sustainable Careers: A Literature Review and Research Agenda Author: Rodrigo Mello; U. of Vaasa Multiple Jobholding and Career Sustainability Author: Aniqa Rehman; Macquarie Business School, Macquarie U. Author: Denise Mary Jepsen; Macquarie Business School, Macquarie U. Author: Grant Michelson; Macquarie U. Empowering Sustainable Careers Author: Mirit K. Grabarski; Lakehead U. Author: Alison M. Konrad; Western U. Author: Lucas Monzani; Ivey Business School Author: Jenifer Lynn Robertson; U. of Western Ontario Author: Maria Mouratidou; U. of Cumbria, UK How Sustainable are Sacrifices: Career Sacrifice Valuation as Unconventional Career Decision Making Author: Jelena Zikic; York U. Author: Anneleen Forrier; KU Leuven Conceptualization and Measurement of Sustainable Career Orientations Author: Jos Akkermans; Vrije U. Amsterdam Author: Beatrice Van Der Heijden; Radboud U. Nijmegen Author: Ans De Vos; U. of Antwerp/ Antwerp Management School Author: Annabelle Hofer; U. of Cologne
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,033 | 0,021 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,013 | 0,028 |
| Communication savante | 0,033 | 0,038 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,018 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,010 | 0,014 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,018 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».