P-52 Asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment in people living with HIV infection (PLWH): are we misdiagnosing for someone?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<h3>Background</h3> HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND) include a spectrum of cognitive, motor and mood problems affecting People Living With HIV (PLWH). For a comprehensive neurocognitive assessment, at least 2 tests for each cognitive domain should be administered. Aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of neurocognitive impairment (NCI) in neurocognitive asymptomatic PLWH attending our outpatient clinics. <h3>Methods</h3> 116 subjects without a previous diagnosis of psychiatric or cerebrovascular events, aged over 18 years, on Antiretroviral treatment (ARV) with an undetectable HIV RNA viremia from more than 1 year, were screened by the same doctor during last autumn routine check-up visits. Attention, concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructive skills, abstraction, calculation, and orientation were assessed with an Italian version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test. The administration time for the MoCA test is 10 minutes; the maximum score is 30 points; a score ≥26/30 is considered normal. Moreover, the following parameters were analyzed: sex, age, CD4 cells count, CD4 nadir, HIV RNA viremia, length of time of ARV treatment, antiretroviral regimen (INSTI based or not, 2DR vs 3DR, NUC sparing), years of schooling, <h3>Results</h3> Among 116 examined subjects, 85 (73%) were male, median age 52 (IQR 42–60) median length of exposition to antiretroviral treatment 10 (IQR 4,7–20.2) years. All of them had HIV RNA viremia below 200 copies/ml: 109 (94%) <50 copies/ml, 67 (58%) TND. Median CD4 nadir 252 (IQR 107–457) cells/µl. Median CD4 cell count 781 (IQR 540–996) cells/µl. Median years of schooling 13 (IQR 8–13). The median MoCA score was 24 (21–26). Thirty one (27%) subjects had a normal value. A Spearman correlation was detected between MoCA score and age (r=-0.26; two tailed p=0.0048); schooling (r=0.335; two tailed p=0.0002); CD4 nadir (r=0.216; two tailed p= 0.02); years of treatment (r=0.233; two tailed p=0.012) (figure 1). No statistical differences were seen regarding normal MoCa score with last CD4 cell count, HIV RNA viremia, ARV regimen, therapeutic strategy. <h3>Discussion</h3> Just a quarter of PLWH screened in this cross sectional analysis performed a normal MoCA score. Age, schooling, longer exposition to ARV treatment and lower CD4 cell count nadir could be potentially associated with pathological score. Cognitive test performances could be strongly influenced by complex educational, cultural and socioeconomic factors which can interact with HIV risk. As a consequence, Frascati criteria could mis-classify over 20% of cognitively healthy individuals as having cognitive impairment. In the era of the effective ARV treatment and ageing for PLWH, cognitive impairment is frequently multifactorial and, hence, is not inevitably a result of the direct effect of HIV on the brain. Nevertheless, a comprehensive neurocognitive assessment should be periodically performed in clinical setting to prevent undesirable impairment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».