Developing Components of an Integrated mHealth Dietary Intervention for Mexican Immigrant Farmworkers: Feasibility Usability Study of a Food Photography Protocol for Dietary Assessment
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Rural-urban disparities in access to health services and the burden of diet-related noncommunicable diseases are exacerbated among Mexican immigrant farmworkers due to work demands, social and geographical isolation, literacy issues, and limited access to culturally and language-competent health services. Although mobile health (mHealth) tools have the potential to overcome structural barriers to health services access, efficacious mHealth interventions to promote healthy eating have not considered issues of low literacy and health literacy, and food preferences and norms in the Mexican immigrant farmworker population. To address this critical gap, we conducted a series of preliminary studies among Mexican immigrant farmworkers with the long-term goal of developing a culture- and literacy-specific smartphone app integrating dietary assessment through food photography, diet analyses, and a non-text-based dietary intervention. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report adherence and reactivity to a 14-day food photography dietary assessment protocol, in which Mexican immigrant farmworker women were instructed to take photos of all foods and beverages consumed. METHODS: We developed a secure mobile app with an intuitive graphical user interface to collect food images. Adult Mexican immigrant farmworker women were recruited and oriented to the photography protocol. Adherence and reactivity were examined by calculating the mean number of food photos per day over time, differences between the first and second week, and differences between weekdays and weekends. The type of foods and meals photographed were compared with reported intake in three 24-hour dietary recalls. RESULTS: In total, 16 Mexican farmworker women took a total of 1475 photos in 14 days, with a mean of 6.6 (SD 2.3) photos per day per participant. On average, participants took 1 fewer photo per day in week 2 compared with week 1 (mean 7.1, SD 2.5 in week 1 vs mean 6.1, SD 2.6 in week 2; P=.03), and there was a decrease of 0.6 photos on weekdays versus weekends (mean 6.4, SD 2.5 on weekdays vs mean 7, SD 2.7 on weekends; P=.50). Of individual food items, 71% (352/495) of foods in the photos matched foods in the recalls. Of all missing food items (n=138) and meals (n=36) in the photos, beverages (74/138, 54%), tortillas (15/138, 11%), snacks 16/36, 44%), and dinners (10/36, 28%) were the most frequently missed. Most of the meals not photographed (27/36, 75%) were in the second week of the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary assessment through food photography is feasible among Mexican immigrant farmworker women. For future protocols, substantive adjustments will be introduced to reduce the frequency of missing foods and meals. Our preliminary studies are a step in the right direction to extend the benefits of mHealth technologies to a hard-to-reach group and contribute to the prevention and control of diet-related noncommunicable diseases.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,020 | 0,022 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».