Freehand Resection of a Stoma Polyp Using Endoscopic-Based Techniques
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
CASE REPORT Colon polyps originating at stoma sites are a rare entity. In this report, we describe a unique case of an adenomatous stoma polyp that was resected without sedation using simplified endoscopic-based techniques. Informed consent was previously obtained from the patient. A 64-year-old woman with a medical history of recently diagnosed stage IIIB rectal cancer underwent an emergent diverting colostomy at an outside hospital for a lower bowel obstruction. On follow-up, the patient was found to have a polyp originating from the colonic mucosa at the ostomy opening. The patient was referred to our service for endoscopic resection of the polyp. The polyp was not reported in the diverting colostomy operating room report. The patient was placed supine, and the stoma bag was removed. The polyp was pulled and exposed and appeared pedunculated, approximately 3 cm long, with a 1 cm thick stalk. The colonoscope was inserted through the stoma and confirmed normal residual colon examination to the level of the cecum. Two 22 mm clips were placed at the base of the stalk using a freehand technique while applying gentle retraction of the polyp. Subsequently, a 20 mm stiff hot snare was positioned above the clips at the base of the stalk. The patient was grounded, and the polyp was resected. Afterward, the post-polypectomy site was inspected carefully. There was no bleeding or perforation, and the procedure was well tolerated. The pathological examination showed tubulovillous adenoma with multifocal high-grade dysplasia. The resection margin was free of adenoma. The patient was treated with total neoadjuvant therapy and is being evaluated for laparoscopic low anterior resection and takedown of loop-diverting colostomy. Stoma polyps are very rare and are, therefore, seldom reported in the literature. This case describes a simplified technique for removing polyps at the stoma site by gastroenterologists using endoscopy-based techniques (Figure 1; Video 1).Figure 1.: The polyp was pulled and exposed (A, B) outside the stoma, and resection was performed (C) as shown in the video. No bleeding or complications post polypectomy (D). {"href":"Single Video Player","role":"media-player-id","content-type":"play-in-place","position":"float","orientation":"portrait","label":"Video 1","caption":"Video describing the case with operating room footage of the procedure and stoma polyp.","object-id":[{"pub-id-type":"doi","id":""},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-stream-id","id":"1_df4oasrv"},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-source","id":"Kaltura"}]} DISCLOSURES Author contributions: P. Vazirnia created and edited video, wrote manuscript. S. Shah, R. Muthusamy, F. Bahdi provided final review and approval of manuscript and video. D. Dawson reviewed and interpreted the pathology. A. Y. Lin was responsible for final review and approval of manuscript and video along with S. Shah, R. Muthusamy, and F. Bahdi. D. Issa performed procedure, reviewed video and manuscript, and is the article guarantor. Financial disclosure: None to report. Previous presentation: This case was presented at the ACG 2023 Annual Scientific Meeting; October 20-25, 2023; at the Vancouver Convention Centre in Vancouver, BC, Canada. Informed consent was obtained for this case report.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».