MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4400580685 · doi:10.1089/aut.2024.0031

“Utterly Overwhelming”—A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Sensory Processing Differences and Mental Health Experiences in Middle-Aged and Older Autistic Adults

2024· article· en· W4400580685 sur OpenAlexaff
Yixin Chen, Christine Jenkins, Rebecca A. Charlton, Francesca Happé, William Mandy, Gavin R. Stewart

Notice bibliographique

RevueAutism in Adulthood · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Établissements canadiensAutism Canada
Organismes subventionnairesUniversity College LondonNIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research CentreKing's College LondonEconomic and Social Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care Research
Mots-clésSensory processingPsychologyMental healthSensory systemDevelopmental psychologyCognitive psychologyPsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Sensory processing differences (SPDs) and mental health symptoms are not limited to young autistic people but continue to occur into adulthood. However, existing quantitative research has predominantly focused on younger autistic people. Less work has been done to investigate SPDs and relationships with mental health conditions in older autistic adults (i.e., aged 40 and older) across their midlife and older adulthood. Methods: A total of 432 participants (autistic n = 265; non-autistic n = 167) aged 40–93 years completed online questionnaires related to SPDs and mental health (i.e., anxiety and depression symptoms). Neurotype and gender differences, age associations, and associations between SPDs and mental health were examined. Participants’ contextualization of their lived experiences of SPDs was analyzed qualitatively. Results: Overall, SPDs and mental health symptoms were more apparent in the autistic group than the non-autistic group, with autistic women showing higher levels of SPDs and poorer mental health than autistic men. SPDs were more often reported to worsen across adulthood by those in the autistic group than those in the non-autistic group, with older autistic people more often reporting worse coping abilities. Furthermore, positive associations between SPDs and anxiety/depression symptoms were observed in the autistic group, with the strength of associations increasing with age. From the qualitative data, we developed six topics reflecting participants’ lived experience of SPDs. Conclusion: Quantitative and qualitative evidence suggest that autistic adults in older age may be more likely to have a heightened risk of SPDs and associated poorer mental health. This study extends previous understanding of SPDs with mainly younger autism populations and highlights the necessity of exploring sensory difficulties in autistic adults in midlife and older adulthood. Community Brief Why is this an important issue? Autistic people often experience sensory processing differences (SPDs), for example, difficulties with sound/noise, textures, tastes, smells, and temperatures. In addition, these SPDs often impact their mental health. Although these SPDs are not unique to autistic people, they experience SPDs at higher rates than the general population. What was the purpose of this study? People of all ages can experience SPDs and mental health conditions. Despite this, much of the existing research on sensory and mental health experiences has focused on young autistic people. This study aimed to explore these experiences in middle-aged (age 40–59) and older (age 60+) autistic people. What did the researchers do? Using an online survey, we asked middle-aged and older autistic and non-autistic adults questions about their experiences of SPDs and their mental health. A total of 265 autistic and 167 non-autistic adults aged 40–93 took part in our survey. About half of our sample were women. What were the results of the study? Compared with the non-autistic participants, the autistic people in our study reported more SPDs, a higher frequency of overwhelming sensory experiences, and lower abilities to cope with their sensory experiences as they aged. SPDs and mental health conditions were found to co-occur, and this was reported more often by older autistic participants. In the open-text responses, autistic and non-autistic people reported that noise was a particular issue, but autistic people were more likely to stress the impacts on their mental health than non-autistic people. Several autistic people mentioned that they had developed coping strategies for managing their sensory experiences, for example, wearing noise-canceling headphones. What do these findings add to what was already known? These findings further our understanding of the experience of SPD in autistic populations. Much of the existing research has focused on younger people, and these findings highlight that middle-aged and older autistic people may need additional support for managing their sensory environments as they get older. It also highlights that sensory experiences should be considered when supporting autistic people with their mental health, and this may be particularly important for older autistic people. What are potential weaknesses in the study? First, our findings are based on cross-sectional data, and thus, we are unable to generate predictive relationships between SPDs and mental health conditions. Second, the subscale used to measure the presence of SPDs included only three items. Third, most current participants are from the United Kingdom, and very few non-binary/trans/gender-fluid individuals took part in this study. Last, there may also be other factors that are influencing the SPDs of middle-aged and older autistic adults that are not taken into consideration in this study, for example, their physical health or their living situation. How will these findings help autistic adults now or in the future? These findings highlight that autistic people in midlife and older age may be particularly susceptible to SPDs, which may impact their mental health. This emphasizes the need for evidence-based interventions to address SPDs and support autistic people with their sensory environments as they age.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,750
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,919

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,350
Écart entre enseignants0,306 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations17
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAutism in AdulthoodMême sujetAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchTravaux en français237 207