Coping with clinical related stress experienced by undergraduate nursing students: A scoping review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
• Clinical learning experiences may be stressful for undergraduate nursing students. • The most frequently used coping mechanism was problem-focused approaches. Coping strategies employed by students were often conceptualized as dichotomous, such as effective or in-effective, rather than dependent on contextual circumstances. • Coping as a concept was primarily explored using measurement tools that limited understanding the processes students used to engage in problem-solving. • Further empirical evidence is needed to equip students with personalized tools and skills that can be used to manage stressors during experiential learning experiences. To identify the strategies used by undergraduate nursing students to cope with clinical related stress. Learning in the clinical environment may be stressful for nursing students. Effective coping mechanisms are imperative given that stress may compromise students’ well-being, ability to learn, and patient care. A scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework. Primary research sources and dissertations were searched using the CINHAL, PubMed, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, and Thesis Global databases as well as an ancestry approach. Eligibility criteria included primary research on undergraduate nursing students’ coping with clinical related stress in an experiential learning environment. From a total of 573 identified articles, 35 met the inclusion criteria. The included studies were primarily conducted using quantitative designs, originated from various countries, and focused on students’ clinical experiences from varying years. The most frequently used coping mechanism was problem-focused approaches. Coping strategies employed by students were often conceptualized as dichotomous, such as effective or in-effective, rather than dependent on contextual circumstances. Coping as a concept was primarily explored using measurement tools that limited understanding the processes students used to engage in problem-solving. This review highlighted a gap in the trajectory of “how” students cope with stress in clinical practice. Further research is needed to inform the development of personalized tools and skills that can be used by students.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,019 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».