Soft Electrostatic RAFA Lens’s Electron Beam Imaging and Diagnosis of Individual Atoms In 3D Specimen – A Proposal
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The ultimate goal of quantitative high resolution electron microscopy is to determine the type of atom at a specific site regardless if it’s a three dimensional amorphous or crystalline material. The proposal herein describes an imaging and diagnostic method that may be able to achieve this capability. Current imaging systems have excellent lateral resolution but lack resolution along the pathlength of the beam due to the lack of an angle to focus the beam plaguing current refractive, deflective and reflective lenses. Apertured blocked beams have the problem of removing most of the beam’s intensity. The reflective advanced focusing aperture (RAFA) lens corrects these problems while maintaining ∼100% of the beam intensity currently being demonstrated using acoustic and laser beams easily implemented since they reflect off a solid surface independent of the beam’s wavelength obeying Snell’s Law so a laser beam focuses to the same far probe position as the acoustic beam enabling new medical treatment modalities [1]. Electron and ion beams are more challenging as their reflective surface requires an electrostatic potential (Fig. 1), which is highly sensitive to fringing fields within the lens’s environment. The proposed application of the electrostatic RAFA lens avoids fringing fields by replacing the reflective surface of Rose’s imaging system placed outside of the electron microscope’s column (Fig. 2) using a magnetic prism deflecting the electron beam towards the reflective electrostatic RAFA lens, which focuses the beam back into the electron microscope’s column [2]. The focused probe intensity within the specimen when apertured enables collection of elastically and inelastically scattered electrons for imaging by a camera and being diagnosed by EELS with no contributions from above or the sides of the probe position (Fig. 3) If collection of the intensity is performed in the Fraunhofer plane, scanning of the beam through the specimen can occur without the aperture having to move. Simultaneous quantitative imaging is accomplished by first collecting intensity from the bottom surface of the specimen and then moving progressively upwards into the specimen. Spherical aberration is compensated by the design of the reflective surface of the RAFA lens and focusing the electron probe/virtual source on the optic axis and chromatic aberration is compensated by using a soft electrostatic surface that varies its potential depending on the acceleration voltage noise and perhaps even the thermal magnetic field noise, both to be presented. A singularity exists at the center of the RAFA lens that shouldn’t be a problem. RAFA lens and mirror are made small (∼10 microns) and thin (∼10 microns) using Focused Ion Beam (FIB) having an aperture hole size of ∼100s microns. Dimensions are flexible. Electrostatic repulsive force of surfaces is same as electron beam’s acceleration voltage. Electron beam deflection from column using a prism lens towards the RAFA lens where it is focused back for re-insertion into the column. Diffuse elastic and inelastically scattered electrons from focused probe/virtual source positions are used to form 3D STEM image and identify elemental compositions and other properties using EELS. In diffraction mode, Fraunhofer imaging, the aperture does not need to move when 3D rastering the beam through the specimen.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».