Understanding regional aerosol deposition in pediatric airways during oral breathing: Insights from computational modeling
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
While there has been considerable investigation into the deposition of inhaled aerosols in the airways of adults, less is known about where aerosols deposit in the lungs of children. Clinical investigation into aerosol deposition in children is complicated by ethical concerns surrounding ionizing radiation studies in children. To meet the need for non-clinical methods of estimating regional deposition in pediatric airways, multiple in silico models were developed to represent the lungs of girls and boys aged 6, 8, 10 and 12 years. The models were symmetric and used a single-path deterministic approach to calculate aerosol deposition in the airways. Regional deposition estimates were provided for children using a fixed set of controlled breathing patterns before characterizing regional deposition during typical tidal breathing in each age group. Deposition patterns were found to be strongly influenced by inhalation flow rate and aerodynamic particle size. Differences between boys and girls in the fraction of inhaled aerosol depositing were minimal during fixed breathing patterns, with higher deposition in all regions of the younger age groups. However, when breathing patterns were adjusted to represent typical tidal breathing in each age group, age differences in the regional fraction of particles depositing became negligible. Moreover, peak deposition fractions in both the conducting and peripheral airways occurred within a narrow range of aerodynamic particle diameters between 2.4 and 2.6 μm, a smaller size range than for adults. During exposure over a fixed period of time, age-related differences in minute ventilation resulted in a larger aerosol dose depositing in the intrathoracic airways of older children. Such differences suggest that to achieve comparative dosing in this age range, older children should inhale aerosols for a shorter time. These findings provide an improved understanding of regional deposition in pediatric airways and will assist in optimizing regional drug delivery to children. • Deposition patterns were influenced by particle size and inhalation flow rate. • No differences in deposition due to sex; influence of age during fixed breathing. • During a typical tidal breath, age-related differences in deposition evened out. • Deposited dose was higher in older children over multiple breaths. • Peak deposition in intra-thoracic regions was at smaller particle sizes than adults.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».