Optimization of Discrete Element Method Model to Obtain Stable and Reliable Numerical Results of Mechanical Response of Granular Materials
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The discrete element method (DEM) is largely used to simulate the geotechnical behavior of granular materials. However, numerical modeling with this type of code is expensive and time consuming, especially when fine particles are involved. This leads researchers to make use of different approaches to shorten the time of calculation without verifying the stability and reliability of numerical results, even though a compromise between the time of calculation and accuracy is commonly claimed. The particle size distribution (PSD) curve of studied granular material is completely ignored or arbitrarily cut. It is unclear if the ensued numerical results are still representative of the studied granular materials. Additionally, one can see a large number of numerical models established on a basis of calibration by ignoring the physical meaning and even measured values of some model parameters. The representativeness and reliability of the obtained numerical results are questionable. All these partly contribute to reducing the public’s confidence in numerical modeling. In this study, a methodology is illustrated to obtain an optimal DEM model, which minimizes the time of calculation and ensures stable and reliable numerical results for the mechanical behavior of a waste rock. The results indicate that the PSD curve of the studied waste rock can indeed be cut by excluding a portion of fine particles, while the Young’s modulus of the waste rock particles can also be decreased to accelerate the numerical calculations. A physical explanation of why the time of calculation can be shortened by reducing the Young’s modulus of waste rock particles is provided for the first time. Overall, the PSD cut, reduction in Young’s modulus, and time step must be determined through sensitivity analyses to ensure stable and reliable results with the shortest time of calculation. In addition, it is important to minimize the number of model parameters determined through the process of calibration, especially for those having physical meanings. In this study, the only model parameter having a clear physical meaning but difficult to measure is the rolling resistance coefficient for repose angle tests on the studied waste rock. Its value has to be obtained through a process of calibration against some experimental results. The validity and predictability of the calibrated numerical model have been successfully verified against additional experimental results.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».