MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4401158059

Sucrose Octasulfate-Impregnated Dressings for Adults With Difficult-to-Heal Noninfected Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Difficult-to-Heal Noninfected Venous Leg Ulcers: A Health Technology Assessment.

2024· review· en· W4401158059 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed · 2024
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueDiagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDiabetic footMedicineFoot (prosody)Intensive care medicineDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyPhilosophy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers may not always heal in a timely manner despite proper wound care. Treatments that improve the healing rate of these ulcers would improve clinical outcomes for patients and may result in downstream cost savings for the health care system. We conducted a health technology assessment of sucrose octasulfate-impregnated dressings for adults with difficult-to-heal noninfected diabetic foot ulcers and difficult-to-heal noninfected venous leg ulcers, which included an evaluation of effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, the budget impact of publicly funding sucrose octasulfate-impregnated dressings, and patient preferences and values. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence. We assessed the risk of bias of each included study using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) and the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. We performed a systematic economic literature search and analyzed the budget impact of publicly funding sucrose octasulfate-impregnated dressings for adults with difficult-to-heal noninfected diabetic foot ulcers and difficult-to-heal noninfected venous leg ulcers in Ontario. We did not conduct a primary economic evaluation because there is existing evidence to approximate the cost-effectiveness of sucrose octasulfate-impregnated dressings in Ontario. We leveraged 4 previous health technology assessments to explore the perspectives and experiences of patients with diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers, as well as the perspectives and experiences of their care partners. Results: We included 3 randomized controlled trials and 2 subsequent publications of these randomized controlled trials in the clinical evidence review. Compared with dressings that do not contain sucrose octasulfate, sucrose octasulfate-impregnated dressings result in faster wound closure in patients with difficult-to-heal noninfected neuroischemic diabetic foot ulcers (GRADE: Moderate) and reduce ulcer size and improve health-related quality of life in the domains of pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression for patients with difficult-to-heal noninfected venous leg ulcers (GRADE: Moderate). The use of sucrose octasulfate-impregnated dressings with noninfected wounds is considered safe (GRADE: Moderate).The economic evidence showed that, compared with dressings that do not contain sucrose octasulfate, sucrose octasulfate-impregnated dressings are highly likely to be cost-effective for both difficult-to-heal noninfected diabetic foot ulcers and difficult-to-heal noninfected venous leg ulcers and would lead to cost savings due to faster and increased complete wound healing. The annual budget impact of publicly funding sucrose octasulfate-impregnated dressings in Ontario over the next 5 years would range from cost savings of $0.93 million in year 1 to $0.62 million in year 5 for adults with difficult-to-heal noninfected diabetic foot ulcers, and cost savings of $0.8 million in year 1 to $0.53 million in year 5 for adults with difficult-to-heal noninfected venous leg ulcers. Overall, we estimate that publicly funding sucrose octasulfate-impregnated dressings in Ontario for adults with difficult-to-heal noninfected diabetic foot ulcers and difficult-to-heal noninfected venous leg ulcers would lead to total cost savings of $3.91 million and $3.38 million, respectively, over the next 5 years.Patients with diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers discussed the effects of living with these wounds, as well as their treatment journey. They spoke about the burden of their condition and its negative impact on their daily lives, including mobility, employment, social activities, and mental health. Patients also spoke about the variety of treatment options available and the financial barriers to accessing these treatments. Conclusions: Sucrose octasulfate-impregnated dressings are safe and improve the healing of difficult-to-heal noninfected neuroischemic diabetic foot ulcers and difficult-to-heal noninfected venous leg ulcers compared with dressings that do not contain sucrose octasulfate. We estimate that publicly funding sucrose octasulfate-impregnated dressings in Ontario would result in cost savings for both difficult-to-heal noninfected diabetic foot ulcers and difficult-to-heal noninfected venous leg ulcers. Evidence from patient engagement suggests that people with diabetic foot ulcers or venous leg ulcers face negative impacts on their quality of life, especially related to mobility. Patients spoke about their challenges, including long and difficult care journeys, as well as trying different treatment options to heal their ulcers and avoid amputation. It is not clear if the participants had direct experience with sucrose octasulfate-impregnated dressings, so we could not draw specific conclusions about these dressings from the preferences and values evidence.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,021
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,083
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: Revue systématique
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,021
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,114

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0210,083
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,010
Bibliométrie0,0090,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,336
Écart entre enseignants0,307 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMedMême sujetDiagnosis and Treatment of Venous DiseasesTravaux en français237 207