Copeptin as a surrogate marker for arginine vasopressin: analytical insights, current utility, and emerging applications
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Copeptin is a 39-amino-acid long glycosylated peptide with a leucine-rich core segment in the C-terminal part of pre-pro-vasopressin. It exhibits a rapid response comparable to arginine vasopressin (AVP) in response to osmotic, hemodynamic, and nonspecific stress-related stimuli. This similarity can be attributed to equimolar production of copeptin alongside AVP. However, there are markedly different decay kinetics for both peptides, with an estimated initial half-life of copeptin being approximately two times longer than that of AVP. Like AVP, copeptin correlates strongly over a wide osmolality range in healthy individuals, making it a useful alternative to AVP measurement. While copeptin does not appear to be significantly affected by food intake, small amounts of oral fluid intake may result in a significant decrease in copeptin levels. Compared to AVP, copeptin is considerably more stable in vitro. An automated immunofluorescent assay is now available and has been used in recent landmark trials. However, separate validation studies are required before copeptin thresholds from these studies are applied to other assays. The biological variation of copeptin in presumably healthy subjects has been recently reported, which could assist in defining analytical performance specifications for this measurand. An established diagnostic utility of copeptin is in the investigation of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome and copeptin-based testing protocols have been explored in recent years. A single baseline plasma copeptin >21.4 pmol/L differentiates AVP resistance (formerly known as nephrogenic diabetes insipidus) from other causes with 100% sensitivity and specificity, rendering water deprivation testing unnecessary in such cases. In a recent study among adult patients with polyuria-polydipsia syndrome, AVP deficiency (formerly known as central diabetes insipidus) was more accurately diagnosed with hypertonic saline-stimulated copeptin than with arginine-stimulated copeptin. Glucagon-stimulated copeptin has been proposed as a potentially safe and precise test in the investigation of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome. Furthermore, copeptin could reliably identify those with AVP deficiency among patients with severe hypernatremia, though its diagnostic utility is reportedly limited in the differential diagnosis of profound hyponatremia. Copeptin measurement may be a useful tool for early goal-directed management of post-operative AVP deficiency. Additionally, the potential prognostic utility of copeptin has been explored in other diseases. There is an interest in examining the role of the AVP system (with copeptin as a marker) in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus. Copeptin has been found to be independently associated with an increased risk of incident stroke and cardiovascular disease mortality in men with diabetes mellitus. Increased levels of copeptin have been reported to be independently predictive of a decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate and a greater risk of new-onset chronic kidney disease. Furthermore, copeptin is associated with disease severity in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Copeptin predicts the development of coronary artery disease and cardiovascular mortality in the older population. Moreover, the predictive value of copeptin was found to be comparable with that of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide for all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure. Whether the measurement of copeptin in these conditions alters clinical management remains to be demonstrated in future studies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».