Contextualizing Technological Stewardship: Origins and Implications of an Approach to Responsible Tech Development
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Multiplicity of "Stewardship" Technological stewardship, or "tech stewardship," is a concept used by some engineering educators as part of strategies to encourage responsible technological development.In the context of Canadian engineering education, the most prominent use of this term is in the Tech Stewardship Practice Program (TSPP), an online course in which several thousand participants -largely undergraduate engineering students at Canadian universitieshave enrolled since 2021 [1].The TSPP positions the term "tech stewardship" as "professional identity, orientation, and practice" with the goal of "bend[ing] the arc of technology towards good," [2].Although the program differentiates the term from other approaches to responsible technological development, understandings of, and approaches to technological stewardship are not the same across all contexts.Other engineering education programs and scholars present technological stewardship in close relation to concepts like social responsibility [3] or responsible innovation [4], or use the term to describe a process of pedagogical design for the engineering classroom, rather than a practice for engineers to engage in [5].Within the TSPP itself, 'tech stewardship' is defined in relation to a set of behaviors.Different parts of the program and related publications describe tech stewardship as a mindset, a practice, and a contributor to cultural change within engineering [6].However, the theoretical grounding of the concept, and its relationship to other ways of teaching and practicing engineering ethics or design, is not discussed within the TSPP itself, nor in its related materials.The authors of this paper are members of a cross-institutional research team studying the effects of the TSPP on students' understandings of engineering responsibility [1].As we began our project in January 2023, the multiple meanings of "tech stewardship"and of "stewardship" itselfbecame apparent.We noticed the word "stewardship" in diverse contexts, including in scholarly literature, on the news, and on our garbage and recycling bins.We spent team meetings discussing the relationship between the "tech stewardship" of the TSPP and notions of stewardship in other contexts: religious, environmental, Indigenous, policy-based, and design-focused.How did the "tech stewardship" of the TSPP position engineers?What was its relationship to the engineering culture that the TSPP founders sought to change?Was it challenging the status quo, or reinforcing it?After two team members stumbled across a book produced by the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States, titled, Teaching and Preaching Stewardship [7], we decided that deeper inquiry into the concept of stewardship was a necessary part of our research.Language, as Williams argues [8], is not a neutral medium for communication.Instead, words are powerful tools that change over time and carry cultural and historical meaning, shaping our practices, thinking, and interactions with the world.When navigating concepts such as technological stewardship, clear definitions enable us to critically engage with them
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,025 | 0,029 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,009 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,013 | 0,052 |
| Communication savante | 0,020 | 0,023 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,016 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».