Experiences and meaningfulness of breast cancer survivorship care in improving the quality of life of immigrant women: A qualitative systematic review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Holistic healthcare approaches tailored to people's needs can enhance quality of life. However, needs of immigrant women in breast cancer survivorship have received little attention. Language barriers can result in significant challenges to accessing healthcare and difficulty in translating information from healthcare providers into self-management. The purpose of this review was to examine the experiences and meaningfulness of breast cancer survivorship care in improving the quality of life for immigrant breast cancer survivors. Methods: A qualitative systematic review using a systematic search of peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed articles of empirical research was conducted. Articles about immigrant women who were diagnosed, treated, and completed their initial course of breast cancer treatment were included. Exclusion criteria were non-immigrant women, men, younger than 18 years, no breast cancer diagnosis, not currently undergoing active or advanced treatment, and not receiving palliative or end-of-life care. Thematic synthesis and qualitative systematic review included studies of survivorship care targeting breast cancer treatment and post-treatment. Articles were obtained from PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar searches, with findings configured according to the JBI methodology. Results: Twenty studies, most of moderate-to high-quality were included. The thematic synthesis identified two overall themes regarding breast cancer survivorship care, as well as subthemes for both. The subthemes of the first theme, challenges and experiences accessing and using healthcare services, were inadequate insurance and benefits, less acculturation and decision-making, discrimination and differential treatment, and influencing sociocultural factors. The subthemes of the second theme, facilitators and barriers to accessing and using healthcare services, included ineffective knowledge and communication, lack of continuity and information, cultural and language barriers, limited access to services, and quality of care. Conclusions: Supporting and engaging immigrant women throughout their breast cancer journey is critical. To do so requires integrating advancements in survivorship care as a systematic approach to lead to a better quality of life and improving patient-reported outcomes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».