Prenatal Predictors of Survival in Isolated Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prenatal fetal imaging findings associated with survival to hospital discharge, persistent pulmonary hypertension (PH), and need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in fetuses with isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) that are undergoing prenatal expectant management. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE through PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov from 2000 up to July 2023. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Studies that reported on prenatal imaging in fetuses with isolated CDH that were undergoing expectant management were included. Primary outcomes were survival to hospital discharge, persistent PH within 28 days of age, and need for ECMO. The quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was performed when at least two studies reported on the same prenatal imaging evaluation. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the side (left or right) of CDH. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: A total of 161 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, with 48 studies meeting the inclusion criteria: 45 (N=3,977) assessed survival, eight (N=994) assessed persistent PH, and 12 (N=2,085) assessed need for ECMO. The pooled proportion was 2,833 of 3,977 (71.2%, 95% CI, 69.8–72.6%) for survival, 565 of 2,085 (27.1%, 95% CI, 25.2–29.1%) for need for ECMO, and 531 of 994 (53.4%, 95% CI, 50.3–56.6%) for need for persistent PH. Prenatal imaging findings that were significantly associated with survival included: total fetal lung volume (mean difference [MD] 13.42, 95% CI, 11.22–15.62), observed-to-expected (O-E) total fetal lung volume less than 30% (odds ratio [OR] 0.09, 95% CI, 0.05–0.17), O-E total fetal lung volume (MD 14.73, 95% CI, 11.62–17.84, I 2 46%), liver/intrathoracic ratio (MD −9.59, 95% CI, −15.73 to −3.46), O-E lung/head ratio (MD 14.03, 95% CI, 12.69–15.36), O-E lung/head ratio less than 25% (OR 0.07, 95% CI, 0.04–0.13), mediastinal shift angle (MD −6.17, 95% CI, −7.70 to −4.64), stomach position in mid-chest (OR 0.14, 95% CI, 0.06–0.36), and intrathoracic liver (OR 0.23, 95% CI, 0.15–0.35). In subgroup analyses, findings for left-sided CDH remained significant in all the aforementioned findings. The only prenatal imaging finding that was significantly associated with persistent PH was intrathoracic liver (OR 1.96, 95% CI, 1.14–3.37), but this association was no longer significant in subgroup analyses. Prenatal imaging findings that were significantly associated with need for ECMO included: O-E total fetal lung volume (MD −10.08, 95% CI, −13.54 to −6.62), O-E lung/head ratio (MD −9.88, 95% CI, 14.44 to −5.33, I 2 30%), subgroup analysis to the left-sided CDH remained significant, percentage of predicted lung volume (MD −9.81, 95% CI, −13.56 to −6.06, I 2 34%), and intrathoracic liver (OR 2.70, 95% CI, 1.60–4.57, I 2 0%), but this association was no longer significant in left-sided CDH subgroup analysis. CONCLUSION: Several prenatal imaging findings, including lung measurements, intrathoracic liver, and stomach position, were predictive of neonatal survival. Lung measurement was predictive of need for ECMO, and intrathoracic liver was significantly associated with persistent PH and need for ECMO.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».