MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4401442104 · doi:10.30770/2572-1852-110.2.38

International Briefs

2024· article· en· W4401442104 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Medical Regulation · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

AustraliaFast-Track Process to Get More Specialists to AustraliaA new process to safely fast-track urgently needed internationally trained medical specialists into the Australian health system was the headline of the Medical Board of Australia’s recent annual meeting.Initially prioritizing general practitioners, anesthetists, obstetricians and gynecologists, and psychiatrists (in line with jurisdictional priorities), the new process aims to get more medical specialists face to face with patients in Australia, through a fast track that will sit alongside the existing specialist medical college assessment system.The new process will recognize specific overseas specialist medical qualifications and grant upfront specialist registration to eligible doctors. Initial conditions on their registration will be imposed as a safeguard to protect patients while the new recruits are inducted into Australia’s healthcare system.The National Cabinet has put regulatory reform squarely in the sights of Ahpra and the Medical Board and set an ambitious timeline for action on the recommendations of the Kruk review, this month’s annual gathering of more than 150 medical regulators and staff nationwide was told.The Kruk review explicitly recommended the creation of an alternative fast track pathway to specialist registration for eligible medical specialists from countries with comparable healthcare systems.Ahpra and the Board have set up a taskforce to develop the new expedited pathway and the Board is now consulting with the specialist colleges for the priority medical specialties to finalize the list of qualifications that will be the gateway to fast-track registration.Source: https://www.medicalboard.gov.au/News/2024-04-30-fast-track-process.aspxPakistanInternational Medical Education Conference HeldThe International Medical Education Conference 2024 under, the leadership of Professor Khalid Masood Gondal, was held on March 1-2, 2024, at the College of Physicians & Surgeons of Pakistan (CPSP) National Headquarters in Karachi. Participants included both international and national medical educationists. The theme of the conference was “Building Trust in Postgraduate Medical Education and Practice.” Attendees included approximately 25 international medical education-ists and delegates from various countries across the globe including the United Kingdom, Ireland, United States, Canada, South Africa, United Arab Emirates, Iran, Turkey, Egypt, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan.The conference was preceded by pre-conference educational workshops in medical and dental institutions throughout the country from February 12-25, 2024, which created an environment of educational festivity and set the stage for the workshops by the international medical educationists at CPSP Karachi on February 27-28, 2024.Additional information about the conference is available at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jj1ItiUxx1LeKimgrRlp_3BiEYwj1F1UreGfKjusVhY/editUnited KingdomGMC Decision Makers Given More FlexibilityCase examiners and other fitness to practice decision makers at the General Medical Council (GMC) now have more discretion to close complaints following updates to its guidance.The changes to the medical regulator’s “Guidance for Decision Makers when Violence and Dishonesty may Represent a Lower Risk to Public Protection,” are part of its commitment to assure fairness in its processes through more efficient and proportionate investigations.Decision makers will now be able to weigh the full circumstances of a concern earlier in the fitness to practice process to assess the overall risk to public protection including to public confidence in the profession—meaning some concerns may not need to be investigated or referred to a tribunal.Concerns that fall under the guidance are those that are minor in nature and did not impact patient care. Allegations of violence and dishonesty which raise a risk to public protection, including where there is a history of repeated behavior, will continue to be investigated.Source: https://www.gmc-uk.org/news/news-archive/gmc-decision-makers-given-more-flexibility-in-cases-where-there-is-a-low-risk-to-public-protection

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,616
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,991

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,503
Écart entre enseignants0,456 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle