Update on Rock-Type Specific Hoek-Brown Constant “s”
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT: Martin (1993) established the m-zero failure criterion following extensive field and laboratory testing at the Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Underground Research laboratory. The m-zero criterion is widely used for assessing excavations in rockmasses with a Geological Strength Index ≥75. Based on the m-zero criterion stopes in massive sulfides in underground nickel mines that were expected to fail did not fail. This observation prompted further studies on the m-zero criterion at the Geomechanics Research Centre. According to the m-zero failure criterion, damage in massive rockmasses is caused by destruction of the Hoek-Brown failure criterion constant "s" with the frictional constant "m" playing no role. The value of the constant "s" to initiate damage was established as 0.11. However, this value was based on studies on the La du Bonnet granite. Suorineni and Kaiser (2002) argued that the "s" value of 0.11 should vary depending on the rock type, and hence the need for rock type-specific "s" values. Suorineni et al. (2009) presented a procedure for the determination of rock type specific "s" values. This paper presents "s" values for different rock types from Kazakhstan in a continuing effort to provide users of the criterion with a database of rock type-specific "s" values. 1. INTRODUCTION There are various failure criteria that exist in rock engineering for the evaluation of the performance of underground excavations in rock. Two frequently used failure criteria are the Mohr-Coulomb (Mohr, 1900; Coulomb) and Hoek-Brown (1980) failure criteria. This paper focuses on the latter, given its history. Given the long history of the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion which dates to the 1700s, one would ask why there was the need for another failure criterion in the 1980s? The Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion has its foundation in soil mechanics. Hoek and Brown (1980) provide the key reasons why the Hoek-Brown failure criterion was necessary for rocks. These authors noted that to utilize the knowledge of stresses induced around underground excavations it was necessary to have available a criterion or a set of rules which will predict the response of a rockmass to a given set of induced stresses. The search for such a criterion for rockmasses had been challenging because of the complexity of the rockmass compared to a soil in that the behaviour of the rockmass transitions from an intact rock to a heavily jointed rockmass as shown in Fig. 1. All the rockmass components in Fig.1 are of concern to the underground excavation designer or rock engineer. The stability of the entire system of underground openings which make up a mine or any underground excavations network depends upon the behaviour of the entire rock mass surrounding these openings, including all the various components of the rockmass in Fig. 1. This observation implies that a failure criterion developed for soils is unlikely to be applicable to a rockmass, and hence the need for a more suitable failure criterion for rockmasses.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,034 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,013 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,018 | 0,015 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».