<i>3DEC</i> Modelling Exploration of Residual Stress Mechanisms
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT: Residual stress exists as a natural phenomenon found in situ and as a by-product of creation for certain man-made materials. An early implication for residual stresses was illustrated with Prince Rupert's drops where, due to induced compressive residual stress magnitudes the material strength is effectively increased. Residual stress exists in a state of equilibrium with their own internal forces, and as a result are often omitted from stress considerations for design but we believe that these stresses may impact the mechanical behaviour. The purpose of this study was to include residual stresses in modelled specimens of rock to investigate the potential for damage to be present as a result of their redistribution. Residual stresses were formed under load, and once present the specimen was unloaded and damage was quantified through the number of broken subcontacts within the model. Compression tests were then performed on the damaged specimens to investigate the presence of crack closure strains as a result of the produced damage. It was shown that residual stresses can produce damage, and such damage also can produce crack closure strains. 1. INTRODUCTION Residual stresses exist as a natural phenomenon found in situ and as a byproduct of formation for certain man-made materials. The state of residual stress contains both compressive and tensile stress magnitudes which allows for the residual stress field to reach a state of equilibrium independently from external pressures. As a result of this self-equilibrating nature, residual stresses are often overlooked as they exist separately from both in situ stress and excavation-induced stresses. However, if a residual stress field is disturbed (e.g., fracture formation), the stresses will mobilize in an attempt to reach a new state of equilibrium and will accompany a measurable strain. Although these stresses exist separately from other common stresses, it is important to understand their existence as they may have consequential impacts if not properly understood. An example of this in steel is the case of the split I-beam (Nau, 2015) where due to casting, residual stresses were created within the beam. Once fully hardened the beam was cut at an angle on both ends which disturbed the state of equilibrium and caused a redistribution of the residual stresses. As a result of their redistribution, the I-beam fully split through the web which then destroyed the beam.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,016 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».