Definition Please – A Rock Engineering Dictionary
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT: definition /def-i-ni-tion/ noun a statement of the meaning of a word, commonly found in a dictionary. Every discipline has its own language – domain specific terminology that allows practitioners to better understand the problem and communicate with one another. While some words and phrases are only found in one specific discipline, there are others that are found in a variety of related disciplines and subdisciplines. Examples in disciplines related and/or adjacent to rock engineering include the terms validation (which has differing definitions in machine learning compared to numerical modelling) and fines (which has differing definitions in soil mechanics compared to cave mining). Confusion may arise when these terms with differing discipline definitions are not defined in their specific context in the literature. Adding to this confusion is the misuse of certain terms in rock engineering, such as accuracy, precision, and quantifying. The goal of this paper is to clarify the definitions of rock engineering terms that are found in other related disciplines, as well as clarify the definitions of rock engineering specific terms. By providing this dictionary of rock engineering terms, we hope to standardize rock engineering vocabulary, allowing for clearer communication among practitioners and students. 1. INTRODUCTION For any rock engineers who competed in spelling bees in their childhood, the phrase "definition please" may ring a bell. During spelling bees, contestants are able to ask for the definition of a word ("definition please?") to help them spell it. While spelling bees are no longer an aspect of our lives after elementary school, asking for the definition of a word remains an important aspect of research and professional development. Every discipline has its own language – domain specific terminology that allows practitioners to understand the problem in greater detail and to better communicate with one another. Rock engineering language consists of its own terminology (such as rock mass rating or geological strength index) and terminology overlapping with other disciplines, such as with soil mechanics, statistics, and numerical modelling. Confusion may arise when terms are not defined in their specific context, especially those overlapping with other disciplines. This confusion is further exacerbated by the tendency of rock engineers to both misuse certain terminology (such as accuracy, precision, and quantity) and use others interchangeably when they do not have the same definition (such as imbalanced data/skewed data and calibration/validation). As a result, there is a clear need to clarify the definitions of certain rock engineering terms.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,062 | 0,046 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».