Integrating Stress Fracturing and Bulking Monitoring for Deformation-Based Ground Support Design Calibration in a Deep Caving Operation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT: In a highly stressed environment, massive rock masses fail through stress fracturing, resulting in rock slabs or spalls that can detach from the excavation perimeter either progressively in a non-violent manner as spalling, or suddenly and violently in the form of strainbursting. Both phenomena ultimately lead to rock mass bulking near the excavation boundary that reduces support system capacity, creating safety risks for workers and costly interruptions in production. An innovative and recent approach to designing support in highly stressed brittle rock, known as deformation-based support design (DBSD), offers advantages in addressing the challenges associated with brittle failures around underground excavations. However, the limited availability of purpose-focused field data and systematic procedures for effectively utilizing monitoring techniques to determine DBSD's critical parameters often hinder its optimization, particularly in deep caving operations. This paper presents a systematic method and recommendations to improve design justification and optimization of the DBSD approach for the PT Freeport Indonesia (PTFI) Deep Mill Level Zone (DMLZ) panel cave mine. The study introduces a systematic process that integrates stress fracturing and bulking monitoring techniques, leveraging monitoring data to calibrate the critical parameters of the DBSD. A site-specific predictive function is proposed for estimating the depth of stress fracturing and the corresponding displacement based on the transient nature of the bulking factor across the extraction level footprint. Implementing this procedure into PTFI's DBSD tool effectively improves the forecasting of preventative support maintenance in areas with high demand, thereby promoting the integrity and reliability of the excavation. 1. INTRODUCTION Experiences gained from past and ongoing deep mining and caving operations suggest that brittle failure around underground excavations have been a significant challenge and contributes to hazards in deep underground operations. This phenomenon poses a safety risk for workers and can result in costly interruptions to production. Brittle failure occurs through stress fracturing. Fractures begin to form when induced stresses exceed the crack initiation strength of the rock (Martin, 1997; Kaiser et al., 2000). These fractures will propagate parallel to the maximum compressive stress and open perpendicular to the direction of minimum confinement. This opening mode distinguishes these fractures as extensional fractures, and differentiates them from shear fractures that develop under higher confinements and involve a shearing displacement mode. Thus, near the excavation boundary where confining stresses are low, the failure process is characterized by the formation of extensional fractures growing parallel to the excavation boundary. This, in turn, results in the creation of a set of rock slabs or spalls that can detach from the perimeter of the excavation, known as spalling. As the deviatoric stresses increase relative to the strength of the rock, it progresses deeper into the rock mass. However, as the spalling moves deeper into the rock mass away from the excavation, the higher confining stresses encountered start to suppress and limit the progression of extensional fracturing, resulting in the transition toward the formation of shear fracturing.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».