Right to Information: A Tool of Good Governance
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the present paper, emphasis has been given on transparency and accountability in administration are the basic elements for the successful functioning of democracy in the country. Like oxygen information is the key element through which a citizen needs to live in the social structure of society and maintain democratic balance. RTI in India evolved through judicial pronouncements. It was declared as a Fundamental Right under Article 19 (1) (A). The Right to Information (RTI) Act of 2005 is a landmark event in this history of Indian democracy. The RTI Act is tools to promote, protect and defend the right to know of Indian citizen. Good Governance can be described as the work done by the government where maximum benefits are given to maximum people. India is a democratic country so participation is required to implement Good Governance. By implementing the RTI Act a big change can be made toward transparency and accountability in governance. The Right to Information is not only mentioned in the constitution but is also a powerful tool for citizen to obtain information from the government as a matter of right. Its reach is very wide. It applies to all government machinery, whether it is all the union, state and local levels or those receiving grants. RTI laws were first enacted in Sweden in 1766, largely motivated by the parliament interest in accessing information held by the like king. Similarly many western democracies like France, Netherland, Australia, New-Zeeland, Canada, and Italy made their own laws. This paper will study the involved peoples implication and extent of key legislation in India that involves people participation and activism. RTI is considered as a means strengthen democracy and usher in focus Good Governance. Responsible citizen – can scrutinize the workings of the government and hold their elected representatives accountable by reviewing their performance and also gain insight into how the bureaucracy in spending public money. No development plan can improve the quality of citizens without Good Governance. The four elements of Good Governance are transparency, predictability, accountability, and participation. RTI helps in achieving this.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle