Conditional generative adversarial network-assisted system for radiation-free evaluation of scoliosis using a single smartphone photograph: a model development and validation study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common spinal disorder in children, characterized by insidious onset and rapid progression, which can lead to severe consequences if not detected in a timely manner. Currently, the diagnosis of AIS primarily relies on X-ray imaging. However, due to limitations in healthcare access and concerns over radiation exposure, this diagnostic method cannot be widely adopted. Therefore, we have developed and validated a screening system using deep learning technology, capable of generating virtual X-ray images (VXI) from two-dimensional Red Green Blue (2D-RGB) images captured by a smartphone or camera to assist spine surgeons in the rapid, accurate, and non-invasive assessment of AIS. Methods: We included 2397 patients with AIS and 48 potential patients with AIS who visited four medical institutions in mainland China from June 11th 2014 to November 28th 2023. Participants data included standing full-spine X-ray images captured by radiology technicians and 2D-RGB images taken by spine surgeons using a camera. We developed a deep learning model based on conditional generative adversarial networks (cGAN) called Swin-pix2pix to generate VXI on retrospective training (n = 1842) and validation (n = 100) dataset, then validated the performance of VXI in quantifying the curve type and severity of AIS on retrospective internal (n = 100), external (n = 135), and prospective test datasets (n = 268). The prospective test dataset included 268 participants treated in Nanjing, China, from April 19th, 2023, to November 28th, 2023, comprising 220 patients with AIS and 48 potential patients with AIS. Their data underwent strict quality control to ensure optimal data quality and consistency. Findings: Our Swin-pix2pix model generated realistic VXI, with the mean absolute error (MAE) for predicting the main and secondary Cobb angles of AIS significantly lower than other baseline cGAN models, at 3.2° and 3.1° on prospective test dataset. The diagnostic accuracy for scoliosis severity grading exceeded that of two spine surgery experts, with accuracy of 0.93 (95% CI [0.91, 0.95]) in main curve and 0.89 (95% CI [0.87, 0.91]) in secondary curve. For main curve position and curve classification, the predictive accuracy of the Swin-pix2pix model also surpassed that of the baseline cGAN models, with accuracy of 0.93 (95% CI [0.90, 0.95]) for thoracic curve and 0.97 (95% CI [0.96, 0.98]), achieving satisfactory results on three external datasets as well. Interpretation: Our developed Swin-pix2pix model holds promise for using a single photo taken with a smartphone or camera to rapidly assess AIS curve type and severity without radiation, enabling large-scale screening. However, limited data quality and quantity, a homogeneous participant population, and rotational errors during imaging may affect the applicability and accuracy of the system, requiring further improvement in the future. Funding: National Key R&D Program of China, Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, Nanjing Medical Science and Technology Development Foundation, Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program, and Jiangsu Provincial Medical Innovation Centre of Orthopedic Surgery.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».