Editorial: Transition care in primary immunodeficiencies
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Transition has been defined as 'a purposeful, planned process that addresses the medical, psychological, and educational/vocational needs of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with chronic physical and medical conditions as they move from childcentered to adult-oriented health care systems' (1).Inborn Errors of Immunity (IEI) are chronic rare disorders that result in impaired, Almost half the countries in their study reported having no practice of transition care.One of the major challenges was the reluctancy of patients and caregivers to adapt to unfamiliarized adult healthcare systems. Inadequate ratio of adult immunologists and facilities for transfer as well as lack of training in transition care were also barriers to smooth transition.It is now well established that an effective process is of utmost importance to improve long term outcome of AYA with chronic conditions. Timing and progression of transition preparation during adolescence is key. Some tools assessing youth readiness for transition are available (mostly in English language). However, both the study by Chan CM et al. and the previous ERN RITA survey highlighted lack of formal transition guidelines for PID as a gap that needs to be addressed (3,4). In this issue, To date, there is relatively little data about patient experience of transition in PID. In this special issue, two studies address this gap. Ouimet F. and adult colleagues from Montréal, Quebec, Canada examine the common transition difficulties for IEI patients with chronic illness which encompassed challenges of changing health care teams as well as issues around developing independence. The authors outline a set of recommendations reported by youths and their families. These include having a joint clinic with both pediatric and adult team, meeting health care professionals from the adult clinical unit, providing information about the adult healthcare setting (including having clear instructions on how and who to contact in case of emergencies) (7). A transition coordinator (such as a dedicated nurse) and connection with a network of youth (and caregivers) who transitioned recently for peer meetings were also recommended. Self-advocacy and medication management were reported by King C et al. as areas of challenge identified by patients during transition. Their study additionally highlighted the specific aspect of unnecessary and costly duplication of investigations (especially laboratory testing) in new transitioning patients. They suggest that implementing a formal transition protocol could minimize these costs (8).These studies highlight the need for further research to understand the parents and caregivers' point of view to inform improvements in transition for PID and develop formal guidelines is needed.Contributions of multidisciplinary health care professionals -pediatric and adult teams, clinical psychologists, and ethicists -alongside contributions of colleagues from different health care systems greatly enriched the perspectives on this topic, highlighting the importance of standardized integration of transition practice towards betterment of transiting PID patients into adulthood.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,022 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,017 | 0,017 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,020 | 0,012 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».