Aphasia and acute care: a qualitative study of healthcare provider perspectives
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Poor communication between patients with aphasia and healthcare providers has many adverse consequences. Training healthcare providers to support communication not only improves skill in communicating with people with aphasia, but also potentially avoids adverse incidents. However, families have reported negative communication experiences for their relatives with aphasia during early acute hospitalization and healthcare providers in acute hospitals have reported multiple barriers to managing people with aphasia.Aims To gather information from healthcare providers about their experiences and needs relative to managing people with aphasia in the acute hospital setting as part of a larger implementation project designed to 1) improve acute care staff communication with patients with aphasia, and 2) help staff provide support to families of people with aphasia.Methods Qualitative methods were employed to gather perspectives of stroke team staff regarding the management of aphasia in early acute care. Methods for collecting data from staff in a large metropolitan hospital in Ontario, Canada included open-ended surveys, observations on acute stroke units, interviews, and focus groups. Data were transcribed and analyzed to identify themes that defined staff experiences and needs relative to caring for people with aphasia in the acute setting.Results The overall finding was that staff found communication and caring for people with aphasia and their families in the acute context to be challenging and frustrating. Themes included identification of the following barriers: fast-paced context with competing priorities; limited staff familiarity with communication access or support; priority given to swallowing by speech-language pathologists; and difficulty in addressing the pressing need to provide support and information to family members of patients with aphasia. In addition, a pervasive need for communication with patients with aphasia as part of staff responsibilities was also identified as a theme.Conclusions Findings demonstrate the need for healthcare systems to support acute care staff in their efforts to provide care for people with aphasia. Finding effective ways to influence system change is a priority and is in line with the rationale for the larger implementation project designed to improve staff and patient/family experiences in acute care.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle