Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I have returned rejuvenated from our annual Rural and Remote Medicine Conference in Edmonton in April. I attended my first conference as a resident in 2006 and I have not missed one since (except for the one we all missed in 2020). Over the last 18 conferences, I have seen the organization grow in scope and impact on rural medicine. I was overjoyed to hear we hosted our largest conference ever this year with over 1100 registrants from across our country and beyond. My clinic partner Dr. Jared Van Bussel and my friend Dr. Kyle Sue-Milne hosted this fantastic gathering which always feels like coming home. I give full credit to our COO, Jennifer Barr, and all the SRPC staff on the amazing work as always. Advocating for rural generalism has never been more needed. The number of rural Canadians without a physician is unacceptable. Rural emergency room closures have become more and more commonplace. Rural obstetrics is sadly on the decline; many rural women are being ignored by health and training systems and denied the opportunity to deliver in their home communities. The challenges are indeed great, and I believe that the SRPC is well-positioned to make a significant impact in healing what ails rural healthcare. There is hope on the horizon. In Alberta, work is underway to establish two new distributed medical campuses in the hopes of training more rural generalists. Across the country, four other new medical schools (SFU, UPEI, TMU, and York) are beginning to take shape, all with a particular focus on primary care. This is where we need your help. These new institutions will need preceptors, curriculum experts, and clinical leaders to make these dreams a reality. I know our plates are more than full, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, but our voices need to be heard at these tables. Your voice also needs to be heard by the SRPC. If you are not a member, please consider joining. If your colleagues are not members, remind them of the great work we have done towards national licensure, supporting hundreds of physicians through the National Advanced Skills Training Program, and our relentless advocacy that led the CFPC to cease the implementation of the third-year in family medicine residency training. I cannot thank Dr. Sarah Lesperance enough for her tireless work as President for the past 2 years and the sage council I have already received from her in her new role as Past President. Watching Sarah grow our organization to new heights-all while dedicating herself to her patients and family-has been inspirational. I am honoured to represent the organization in my new role as President and look forward to connecting with you all.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».