Impact of the Novel MRI Contrast Agent Gadopiclenol on Radiotherapy Decision Making in Patients With Brain Metastases
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of gadopiclenol versus gadobenate dimeglumine contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on decision-making between whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for treatment of brain metastases (BMs). METHODS: Patients with BMs underwent 2 separate MRI examinations in a double-blind crossover phase IIb comparative study between the MRI contrast agents gadopiclenol and gadobenate dimeglumine, both administered at 0.1 mmol/kg. The imaging data of a single site using identical MRI scanners and protocols were included in this post hoc analysis. Patients with 1 or more BMs in any of both MRIs were subjected to target volume delineation for treatment planning. Two radiation oncologists contoured all visible lesions and decided upon SRS or WBRT, according to the number of metastases. For each patient, SRS or WBRT treatment plans were calculated for both MRIs, considering the gross target volume (GTV) as the contrast-enhancing aspects of the tumor. Mean GTVs and volume of healthy brain exposed to 12 Gy (V 12 ), as well as Dice similarity coefficient scores, were obtained. The Spearman rank (ρ) correlation was additionally calculated for assessing linear differences. Three different expert radiation oncologists blindly rated the contrast enhancement for contouring purposes. RESULTS: Thirteen adult patients were included. Gadopiclenol depicted additional BM as compared with gadobenate dimeglumine in 7 patients (54%). Of a total of 63 identified metastatic lesions in both MRI sets, 3 subgroups could be defined: A, 48 (24 pairs) detected equal GTVs visible in both modalities; B, 13 GTVs only visible in the gadopiclenol set (mean ± SD, 0.16 ± 0.37 cm 3 ); and C, 2 GTVs only visible in the gadobenate dimeglumine set (mean ± SD, 0.01 ± 0.01). Treatment indication was changed for 2 (15%) patients, 1 from no treatment to SRS and for 1 from SRS to WBRT. The mean GTVs and brain V 12 were comparable between both agents ( P = 0.694, P = 0.974). The mean Dice similarity coefficient was 0.70 ± 0.14 (ρ = 0.82). According to the readers, target volume definition was improved in 63.9% of cases (23 of 36 evaluations) with gadopiclenol and 22.2% with gadobenate dimeglumine (8 of 36), whereas equivalence was obtained in 13.9% (5 of 36). CONCLUSIONS: Gadopiclenol-enhanced MRI improved BM detection and characterization, with a direct impact on radiotherapy treatment decision between WBRT and SRS. Additionally, a more exact target delineation and planning could be performed with gadopiclenol. A prospective evaluation in a larger cohort of patients is required to confirm these findings.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».