Legacy mines: geothermal energy exploitation and storage
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Mining plays a crucial role in human society, encapsulated by the saying, “Everything we use is either grown or mined.” However, once resources are depleted, most mines are inevitably closed and abandoned, posing significant risks to both human health and the environment. Simple closure and improper management of these legacy mines result in significant resource wastage and create numerous safety, environmental, and social challenges. Unlike well-developed mining countries such as the USA, UK, Canada, and Germany, which have been repurposing legacy mines for decades, China recently began the regenerative utilization of closed and abandoned mines. This delay has resulted in a weaker foundation of basic theory and key technology in this field. Among the various models for repurposing legacy mines, photovoltaic and wind power generation, pumped hydroelectric energy storage, compressed air energy storage, and geothermal energy exploitation and storage have garnered significant attention. Abandoned mines, especially those that become flooded, can easily form low-enthalpy mine water ‘hydrothermal reservoirs’ characterized by high permeability and cost-effective drilling. However, a lack of understanding of these shallow to medium-depth geothermal reservoirs—including their development potential and feasibility—hinders the widespread implementation of this approach, particularly in obsolete collieries. This study analyzes the diachronic and spatial characteristics of mine-oriented geo-thermal energy exploitation and storage. It introduces a new concept: geothermal energy exploitation and storage throughout the entire life cycle of a mine within Earth Critical Zone. From a temporal perspective, projects should be implemented sequentially during the exploration, construction, production, and legacy phases of a mine. Spatially, the mine-oriented geothermal energy exploitation and storage process involves the migration of various substances (solid: soil/rock; liquid: water; gas: wind and compressed air) and energy conversion (wind, solar, heat, geopotential, and mechanical energy) within Earth Critical Zone (atmosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, pedosphere, and lithosphere). A key scientific challenge lies in understanding the migration of Earth’s fluids and energy conversion in near-earth-contact environments during mine-oriented geothermal energy exploitation and storage. To address this challenge, it is essential to analyze the similarities and differences between mine and traditional geothermal reservoirs in terms of heat source, genesis pattern, and compensation and drainage conditions. Specifically, large-diameter, high-flow, single-hole, and steady-state pumping tests are recommended to obtain basic hydrogeological parameters. These can be used to create a 3D geological model of the targeted mine strata, which can simulate and evaluate the quasi-water seal effect during the mine-water heat storage process in legacy shafts. Theoretical analyses, numerical simulations, and model experiments are urgently needed to understand the formation and dissipation mechanisms of thermohaline stratification in large-scale mine water bodies, as well as its impact on heat and mass transfer. Solving these issues will enhance the scientific understanding of geothermal resources in legacy mines, strengthen the technical support for mine geothermal energy exploitation and storage, and accelerate the development of new high-quality productivity in the transformation of the local legacy mine industry in China.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».