MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4401812362 · doi:10.1186/s41043-024-00625-0

Risk factors for non-communicable diseases in Afghanistan: insights of the nationwide population-based survey in 2018

2024· article· en· W4401812362 sur OpenAlexaff
Omid Dadras, Muhammad Haroon Stanikzai, Massoma Jafari, Essa Tawfiq

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Health Population and Nutrition · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineEnvironmental healthOverweightPublic healthPopulationEpidemiologyDemographyObesityCross-sectional studyNon-communicable diseaseGerontologyInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) account for a substantial number of deaths in Afghanistan. Understanding the prevalence and correlates of major NCD risk factors could provide a benchmark for future public health policies and programs to prevent and control NCDs. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the prevalence and correlates of NCD risk factors among adults aged 18-69 years in Afghanistan. METHODS: We used data from the Afghanistan STEPS Survey 2018. The study population were 3650 (1896 males and 1754 females) adults aged 18-69 years sampled from all 34 provinces through a multistage cluster sampling process. Information on behavioural and biological risk factors was collected. We used STATA (version 18.0) for data analysis. RESULTS: Of the total participants, 42.8% were overweight or obese, 8.6% were current smokers, 26.9% had insufficient physical activities, 82.6% had low consumption of fruits and vegetables, and only 0.5% had ever consumed alcohol. Approximately 15% of participants had a high salt intake, while 25% and 8% had elevated blood pressure and blood glucose levels, respectively. Similarly, around 18% had elevated total cholesterol. The study revealed a lower prevalence of current smoking among females [AOR = 0.17, 95%CI (0.09-0.30)] compared with males, but a higher prevalence in those who had higher education levels [1.95 (1.13-3.36)] compared with those with no formal education. Insufficient physical activity was higher in participants aged 45-69 years [1.96 (1.39-2.76)], females [4.21 (1.98-8.84)], and urban residents [2.38 (1.46-3.88)] but lower in those with higher education levels [0.60 (0.37-0.95)]. Participants in the 25th to 75th wealth percentiles had higher odds of low fruit and vegetable consumption [2.11 (1.39-3.21)], while those in the > 75th wealth percentile had lower odds of high salt intake [0.63 (0.41-0.98)]. Being overweight/obese was more prevalent in participants aged 45-69 years [1.47 (1.03-2.11)], females [1.42 (0.99-2.01)], currently married [3.56 (2.42-5.21)] or ever married [5.28 (2.76-10.11)], and urban residents [1.39 (1.04-1.86)]. Similarly, high waist circumference was more prevalent in participants aged 45-69 years [1.86 (1.21-2.86)], females [5.91 (4.36-8.00)], those being currently married [4.82 (3.12-7.46)], and those being in 25th to 75th wealth percentile [1.76 (1.27-2.43)]. A high prevalence of elevated blood pressure was observed in participants aged 45-69 years [3.60 (2.44-5.31)] and currently married [2.31 (1.24-4.31)] or ever married [6.13 (2.71-13.8)] participants. Elevated blood glucose was more prevalent in older adults ([1.92 (1.09-3.39)] for 45-69 and [3.45 (2.44-5.31)] for 30-44 years), urban residents [2.01 (1.33-3.03)], and ever-married participants [4.89 (1.48-16.2)]. A higher prevalence of elevated cholesterol was observed in females [2.68 (1.49-4.82)] and those currently married [2.57 (1.17-5.63)] or ever married [4.24 (1.31-13.73)]. CONCLUSION: This study used up-to-date available data from a nationally representative sample and identified the prevalence of NCDs and associated risk factors in Afghanistan. Our findings have the potential to inform and influence health policies by identifying people at high risk of developing NCDs and can assist policymakers, health managers, and clinicians to design and implement targeted health interventions.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,042
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,955

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,052
Tête enseignante GPT0,342
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations9
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Health Population and NutritionMême sujetGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyTravaux en français237 207